LWN says Nate Graham has backed off on the KDE pro-AI policy for the moment:

https://lwn.net/Articles/1096518/

> However, Martin warned that he was starting to see ""an increase of purely LLM-generated merge requests"" where it was clear that the description and code were entirely LLM-generated ""and the person that is submitting it doesn't really know what the patch does"". He said that it's ""not that many"" yet, but he felt that there was a need for an explicit AI policy so that maintainers had guidelines they could rely on and point potential contributors to. Nate Graham had started work on such a policy, but it appears that has been abandoned after the policy became a lightning rod for online criticism. Whether he, or another KDE contributor, will pick that up again is unclear.

I don't trust that the AI crew aren't just waiting for their next possible chance of course.