Slogans that advocate FOR something can bring change (not necessarily good).
Slogans that solidify against something stoke division.
Sometimes, a slogan can be both for AND against. For example: “Tax the rich”. That can work, but it’s better if it can be framed only in terms of FOR.
What should be intolerable division (but is sadly tolerated) is not dissipated with divisiveness. It doesn’t make any difference if the framing of it is empirically, historically true – it’s still tactically inept
@urlyman I have been thinking about this since yesterday, but struggled to put into words that wouldn't make the issue worse if most people were to repeat them. I didn't say anything, but most of all I didn't *write a fucking manifesto*