@pixelfed Any Business that rejects Ai Im automatically a fan of !

A clear contribution policy saves maintainers from reviewing work they cannot safely merge. It also tells newcomers exactly where human judgment still matters.

@pixelfed even though there is a stronger consensus that using AI will degrade the project quality in the long term, I personally feel like we have to find middle ground. Completely abandoning AI will slow down progress. I see so many pain points in using the #pixelfed app itself. I feel, goal should be to make OSS genuine alternative to private software and taking AI's help, will help us achieve it. But doing a complete vibe coding is a no no. Tools like auto completion are really helpful tools

@pixelfed Impressive!

@pixelfed

@pixelfed that's great news! even in a time where vibe coding or contributions related to it are becoming more and more common even though i don't think vibe coding should be like that or should even be a thing at most but regardless that's still great news

@pixelfed well that’s dumb. Since when do users dictate anything?

@pixelfed You will thank your earlier self when you have to go back and edit code in the future.

@pixelfed a step towards the right direction

@pixelfed
Great. Now unban my @LargeGiraffe account.

@pixelfed I am a bit confused by the wording here.

"We are not accepting any AI or agentic code contributions" is very different to "[...]contributions that are substantially generated by generative AI or large language models will not be accepted"

Is the intention that these two statements have the same interpretation?

@pixelfed ping @salva_pl

@pixelfed

Hoorah.

This foto wasn't created with AI, cause I made 2010 in Berlin and after it was taken, I never took an AI-creator or something like this. It's a wrong decision and false.

@pixelfed Actually banning agentic contributions isn't really a good idea, as people can actually achieve good quality with coding agents.