When I see statements like "teenagers are spending 4-6 hours online, instead of going outside and meeting people" as a justification for further web regulation, I wonder to myself:
- if it had been 4-6 hours reading books, practising musical instruments, creating art, or similar, would they be demanding that books, instruments etc. have a watershed? If not, why not?
- what is the "acceptable" amount of time for a teenager to spend online each day? What makes it so?
- "going outside and meeting people" suggests a particular worldview of what is "good", which will appeal to - indeed, be possible for - some people far more than others. I was never massively sociable, and that's no crime. A day at school, and now work, would involve plenty enough peopling time for me. I am far more sociable online then offline. Where are the local free places where teenagers can get to and hang out, safely, in the warm? (They might exist in some places?)
@neil as a parent who himself grew up with too much screen time, I try to limit my kids screen time, but I also recognize how the quality of screen time is also a major factor, and I parent accordingly
I think the major problem is that regulators are focusing entirely on just one head of the hydra (screen time and phone addiction) and focusing on just fighting that one head instead of focusing on the body of the hydra. Yes every head of the hydra is a nasty beast inofitself, and yes it's an achievement to defeat one head, but if you know your mythology, you cut off one head two more replace it.
I think the body of the hydra is the advertising surveillance economy. The server capacity to support billions of people using platforms for multiple hours per day is so much more than the server capacity for billions of people to use platforms for multiple minutes a day. Platforms only refine themselves for this level of addiction because it's profitable, and if their profit model was something other than advertising and data harvesting they would actually *want* users using their platforms less!
I strongly believe this is why the legislation trying to create privacy protections, limit technology addiction, etc. has been largely ineffectual. They aren't focused on the problem they're focused on the symptoms! The EU cut off the data harvesting head of the hydra with the GDPR and two more replaced it as companies still found ways to compliantly harvest and sell data to maintain their business models. Countries are passing age verification bills to cut off the head of childhood smartphone addiction just to create more heads in loss of privacy and the logical effects of the age verification bills themselves!
Anyways I've rambled enough, but obviously this is something I care about and I hope more can start to see the forest for the trees