incredible creatures
https://x.com/rationalaussie/status/2097647473099673861
i'd like to think it's parody, but he's a bitcoiner too
1 Boost
0 Likes
@davidgerard 'we used immeasurable energy and resources to make a quickly verifiable proof of P=NP'
@davidgerard
FTL travel, soon come.
The Circle will be Squared by the end of the year
@davidgerard @cstross also it did NOT take 88 hours of compute, OpenAI spun up 10,000 agents to work on it and admit it cost on the order of $20m in compute, where does this guy get his numbers?
@NotTheLBCGuy @davidgerard @cstross The number 88 is a nazi dog whistle.
@rhelune @cstross @davidgerard @NotTheLBCGuy … except in the Nails song “88 Lines About 44 Women”.
@marcas @rhelune @davidgerard @NotTheLBCGuy Betcha if they wrote it today they'd have to think of another couplet so they could run it out to 92 lines about 46 women.
@NotTheLBCGuy @davidgerard @cstross spending $20 million to get a $1 million Millennium Prize is a bit of an on-the-nose satire for this whole AI bubble
@NotTheLBCGuy @davidgerard General rule of thumb: anyone calling themselves "rational" (like this dude) is projecting like crazy. See also: Donald Trump, Very Stable Genius.
@davidgerard honestly some subtly-flawed nearly incomprehensible machine proof that P = NP might be good for the world with all the resources it would direct away from worse applications?
Also, someone should tell this chud that "Well the Halting Problem is at least an order of magnitude harder than P = NP" and wait to see the machine generated solution to the halting problem.
@davidgerard man who confidently pronounces on subjects he only vaguely vaguely understands believes the Mansplaining as a Service machine is actually the machine God? Yeah, that tracks.
@NotTheLBCGuy @davidgerard Dunning-Kruger perpetual motion generator
@steppe_lord @davidgerard @NotTheLBCGuy “insights about the economy, tech and culture. His main emphasis is on the intersection of macroeconomics and AI”
somewhere a CompSci minor student putting their spare Mac and ai model to use 🤣 <https://www.rationalaussie.com/about/>
@peterrenshaw @steppe_lord @NotTheLBCGuy i see the substack has a pile of the sort of post you'd expect from someone who dropped in an "88" that isn't true
@davidgerard "88" and "NS" in the same sentence? That's a fash-tech-bro!
@davidgerard and the quick factorization of any number is for christmas ?
@davidgerard I don't get what this is about, but I do get the important part: this IS freakin' dumb.
@davidgerard what a classically trained dipshit.
@davidgerard well they’ve already proved 4 = 5, why the hell not