RE: https://mastodon.social/@fishsauce/117197967467000541
This is fascinating, useful, and – within the limited ambit of my knowledge – accurate. I’d love to know more about who’s responsible, though.
Discussion
RE: https://mastodon.social/@fishsauce/117197967467000541
This is fascinating, useful, and – within the limited ambit of my knowledge – accurate. I’d love to know more about who’s responsible, though.
@adamgreenfield @blogdiva Not to be too much of a downer, but it looks like this site might currently be too new to be too useful. The idea seems to be that people submit and vote on the "standard" tools, and once a particular tool gets 10 net upvotes in a category, it gets recognized as "standard".
Zero tools are recognized.
Each category does seem to have a number of tools that are proposed, and the ones I've seen certainly aren't the worst choices, but bear this site with a grain of salt: these aren't the "industry standards", but they're "what a couple people think the industry standards are".
Hopefully, this site will take off and become a real repository of broad expertise.