This thread has my scattered takes on the Meta settlement agreement, at first skim. It covers a lot of the big pieces, despite beginning with a more tangential interest of mine about the MPA (nee MPAA).
I think a settlement like this should be unconstitutional. But it's a weird new legal Q.
RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:7zwztfs4yywggefayx7oid35/post/3mtyncxphq226
LOL Meta's settlement with the AGs et al still uses content rules "inspired by movie ratings for ages 13+" even after the MPA told them to stop claiming to be "guided by" PG-13 ratings because it Meta "literally cannot" emulate MPA's human curation.
