From the Linux Kernel Mailing List: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260818212923.2725202-1-kuba@kernel.org/
> We are completely overwhelmed, of course. The glimmer of hope is that we secured sufficient LLM budget and access (thank you Meta!) to run reviews with multiple frontier models on each patch. This eliminates some hallucinations. That said, in terms of review, the LLMs can only do so much. The sad truth is that our APIs (especially for rare events like PCIe errors, timeouts etc.) have always been racy, and now LLMs don't let us ignore that. I expect our direction for the next release will be to tweak the reviews a little bit more, but start shifting focus to letting the LLMs take care of the busy work - managing patchwork, automating common process complaints, editing commit messages, and maybe applying patches which already got "reviewed-by" tags from people we trust...
I look at the above and can't help but wonder if this is the "vibe bobsled" in action https://dustycloud.org/blog/faulty-towers-vibe-sickness-and-the-vibe-bobsled/
