It's really strange, there were all of these articles and think pieces and op eds after the Hong shock loss, but I've seen barely anything at all after the Vindman shock loss.
Can't imagine why.
1
Reply
0
Boosts
To be clear:
I like a lot of things about both Vindman and Hong. I'm more interested in the broader traditional media orgasm over Hong losing and how the broad commentariat continue to misunderstand the supposed "left vs. center split" in the party.
In this case I think there's an awful lot of wisdom in the decisions the rank and file are making about nominations and almost none in the various doofuses writing about it.
