The patent illustration directly shows a male directing his surveillant gaze at a woman. Plain and simple, openly and unambiguously, Meta is in the incel-tech business
19
Replies
7
Boosts
Gets even worse. On Page 34 it is described the woman is determined to be "of interest" to the man (she is described to be "the wife") so she stays in focus even tho the glass wearer really oogles the high heeled miniskirt lady.
There are really layers of badness in this one. What a pleasant place to work meta must be.
Direct link to pdf:
https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/28556604/meta-fac-rec-party-patent.pdf
@iwoakura
They surely know their market firsthand
The male gaze is now the Meta gaze. 👀 🕶️
@ophiocephalic but why is his asscrack labeled 502?
@catmisgivings
You don't want to know what that patent is for
@ophiocephalic note the laughing Chad (506)
Mark Zuckerberg is the real victim here
![screenshot of toot by "failed Lyndon Larouchite" at mas.to which reads:
I know I am a cranky old guy, but in my opinion anyone who likes or boosts this post by ophiocephalic should have their account suspended for 24 hours for posting misleading crap
If you actually bother to read the pdf of the application (see replies) you see that ophio has taken one of several of figures that don't show male gaze
eg see Fig5A in the pdf (link in reply) so this post is just horribly misleading
[followed by a screenshot of my top post]](https://kolektiva.social/system/media_attachments/files/117/134/518/386/801/808/original/c026b0c051a80239.png)
@ophiocephalic These people have gone beyond boot-licking to make a three course menu of the boot, with hollandaise sauce and a nice fava beans garnish.
@ophiocephalic@kolektiva.social more and more people giving others authorization to punch them in the face...
@ophiocephalic I mean Facebook legitimately started with Mark Zuckerberg stealing photos from Harvard house intranet sites (called facebooks) and putting them side by side and asking users to rate their hotness. Do we really expect anything better from this guy?
@Infoseepage
Yes, it's a very consistent pattern
@ophiocephalic is this infographic for real? This is so fucking lame
@alien
Yes, it's real; can be seen in the linked article
