I hate to do posts that seem like sort of humblebrags designed to cynically drive engagement. This isn't that. But.... this bears saying. I was in a situation yesterday - an all day training course - with a lot of people who are trying to make the world better. People at the cutting edge of social justice. As left wing as it gets. There was shouting, fists in the air and people referring to one another as comrade. All walks of life were in representation. But. In one of the exercises - a scenario with role play - there was a clear example of a non-gendered person, and people just could not understand that instead of referring to a female-coded name, they should be referring to them as they/them instead of she/her. I found myself the only person in a group of maybe 30 people who had to openly and vocally say - no, it's they/them. It is not her/she(bar). No one really understood and I had to say 'sorry everyone, but this person isn't gendered' and they all looked at me like I was mental and carried on referring to the person in the female gender. I did it like 4 times. Do people in the wider universe (ie. Not Fedi or my brain) not understand this? I feel like in 2026 this isn't some kind of ineffable concept. Am I weird? I don't feel like I am (well I definitely am, but not in this) and it's not *that* difficult to understand? I was going to start calling the he's she's and the she's he's in the group to drive the point home, but thought that might be a step too far. Hopefully I made my point and they'll (THEY'LL) think about it later. But, dudes. If you can fight the good fight for the people, you can at least understand some people are non-binary?
13
Replies
·
0
Boosts
@TheBreadmonkey Some people just don't get it no matter what. :(
@TheBreadmonkey It's baffling, isn't it?
If someone changes their name, by deed poll, the extremely vast majority of other people can work with that very quickly. I've never seen anyone doing "Hey Phil, you just don't look like a David so I'll keep calling you Phil".
The fact that someone decides they want to be referred to as *how they feel* rather than necessarily how they appear, and others won't/don't/can't accept that is as baffling to me as apparently the pronouns thing is to them.
@TheBreadmonkey Thank you so much for doing that, and for being you. 💛
@TheBreadmonkey
You are LegBendary! Kudos to your efforts against a tidal wave of bigots.
@TheBreadmonkey This concept is an entirely effable one. You are not a looney. At work we have had quite a number of ‘they/them’ personnel and they’ve all be respected as such.
It’s quite unfortunate you had to deal with a bunch of hide-bound, insensitive, wank-heads.
@TheBreadmonkey That's very disappointing. Was it an age thing? I've found that younger people are usually perfectly fine with "they" whereas people my age (50s) seem almost incapable.
No one under 20 but I think a couple under 30 and a couple of people I was really surprised didn't get it because I assumed they were enbies
@TheBreadmonkey Wow, that's even weirder.
I'm trying very hard not to be judgemental about how the hard left are extremely good at "othering" people, even as they insist they would never. But I haven't had very good experiences of that type.
@TheBreadmonkey @janeishly To quote my dad: tha's none so blind as those who won't see.
@TheBreadmonkey We have two people who have transitioned in the last year at work and prefer 'they/them'. Everyone has just changed how they refer to them without even blinking. It's quite refreshing.
