@dangillmor laws do not apply to the rich or the so called “money and job makers”, which is complete nonsense

What comes around goes around

@dangillmor How does
it differ from outright fraud?

That’s the neat part. It doesn’t!

@dangillmor
Why would you not print out the contract when signed?
Hard copies are the best backup.

@dangillmor This is why I always keep a printed copy of all contracts, even today.

@dangillmor

It's bizarre to me that someone has to "access" the contract online. Instead of, you know, printing it out on paper and filing it somewhere safe.

@dangillmor Contract fraud. Clear and simple.

@dangillmor arrogant, criminal behaviour. Contracts require a meeting of the minds (a common understanding of what is being agreed) how could that be possible with the terms changed without your knowledge or agreement. What was sold for $15,000?

@dangillmor

Hate to tell you this, but most contracts signed with a click to agree have clauses that allow the issuer to change terms at anytime. Banks do this all day long.

@dangillmor Same way all the tech companies do, of course: having a clause in the original contract allowing them to unilaterally change it.

@dangillmor wouldn’t buy any of these SwastiCars if it was the only carproducer on the planet.

@dangillmor

@dangillmor I don't know why any court accepts this "online signed with your mouse" bullshit.

But Tesla's diesel is clean. 😐

@dangillmor surely it invalidates the contract (I’m not a lawyer but can’t see how that would stick in an actual case)

@dangillmor
... same way Brit gov't changing student loan payback rules ...