@onepict
I very trying to bring this issue from an anthropology lenses into NGOs and very often the reaction is like "we don't do philosophy" in our report. Leftist NGOs BTW.
"
I might be a bad writer and also bad analyst but, I think, it tells us something close and not similar to "we are politically polite / sensible / balanced ".
I mean, it's not just philosophy, but it could be. It's anthropology and it's definetly not a matter of "category". And it's about fact and clues. Something distorted or destroyed by AI / LLM and previously by other Carbon actors.
So what, in your view, is the point of categorising a fact established by scientific consensus differently or in a different context?
I don’t want to jump to conclusions, and I try not to judge (it is through judgement that we categorise things). I’m trying to understand.
Very often, the topic of AI/LLMs triggers strong emotional reactions, which are often fundamentally contradictory.
In some ways, this resembles what I’m experiencing and observing with regard to the issue of pesticides or plastics.
https://we.riseup.net/assets/857041/Pollution%20Is%20Colonialism%20
https://civiclaboratory.nl/
Cc @timnitGebru