@drahardja Sorry, but the only fact he compares himself to worldwide recognized artists, make me feel my own right to say I'd like a huge group of living being to urinate on him. Not on the statue, on him.
Commemoration? Kirk was a fanatic, and has (too many) fanatics remembering him with honor. And statues are generally a sign of commemoration. True. But someone should be humble enough, to accept that if the figure represented on that statue has brought hatred in his whole life, the so-called artist cannot complain of not feeling accepted! They say that you make your bed, and then lie on it.
About Charlie Kirk himself, I consider him as a meaningful symbol, to be sadly remembered: he represents the failing part of America which goes behind politics, right, left.
It's a 22-years-old shooting to a 31-years-old guy, the sign of where politics should never arrive. Not something to be honored, but a warning. "never more arrive to that point"