With all of the ACM discourse going on, might as well chip in on a tangent.
Not reading a paper before citing it was always drilled into me as a cardinal sin. At St Andrews we had a yearly academic misconduct briefing. Then Uni-wide academic practice training.
15 years on, post-LLMs, we have ostensibly serious people defending “hallucinated” (fabricated) citations. It annoys me that these charlatans can pump crap into the literature just like Thames Water with absolutely zero consequence.
No replies yet
Be the first to share your thoughts.