Discussion
https://netmonk.org/works/causal-emergence-os3/
@theruran @50htz @vidak @kkarhan @oceane
See, we're not the only ones playing the determinism card. For good reasons. But what we do is way more revolutionnary and innovative than their approach. Still, I think their approach is the best we can do with current CPUs.
@theruran Yes, it's more AU slop, but if it's their ideas, just using AI as I do to synthesize my boring terrible English texts, it's not an issue that much. At least, we agree on some key goals, dealing with determinism restoration. But at this level, they do lie a little bit : they are conscious IRQ and DMA are breaking determinism, they say they use event stacks in an event loop to
@theruran mitigate IRQ breaking determinism, but their claim is only partially true : They still use their CPU interrupts, even if their handling subroutine just "post events".
It still breaks strict determinism. So they lie.
On our side, on the contrary, IRQ are conceptually truly suppressed fully from our sequential engines and system in general.
They are no longer needed.
Install bonfire.cafe
Get the full app experience
