(1/2)
1 of these things is not like the other;
"Meta and Google liable and ordered them to pay $6 million in damages to a now 20-year-old who said that deliberate addictive design features on social media platforms like Instagram got her hooked from a young age and exacerbated mental health problems like depression and anxiety."
"Prior to that verdict, platform operators were protected from liability for third-party content under Section 230 ..."
https://gizmodo.com/metas-teen-safety-case-just-became-a-1-4-trillion-existential-threat-2000782306
(2/2)
Ece Yildirim doesn't seem to have noticed that holding a company accountable for their app design has nothing to do with the fact that the app happens to display third-party content. So it has nothing whatsoever to do with Section 230. But hey, let's all hate on Section 230, coz doing that is so hot right now.
