“The AI Bubble — No One's Happy”
https://nooneshappy.com/article/the-ai-bubble/
> The buildout is underwritten by an implicit guarantee that none of the people who made the bet will be the ones who pay for it.
Replies:
4
Boosts:
2
@baldur There are lots of indications of LLMs "assisting" in the writing process of this blog post.
- a lot of em-dashes
- "It's not A. It's B", where it doesn't provide any value and is just fluff
Also the whole blog has a lot of red flags:
- only 3 articles published in relatively short succession
- no real person or name attached
Oh the irony...
@janriemer First, those aren’t LLM indications. Those are standard writing tools that predate LLMs and are in LLM output because it’s trained on it. Secondly, I disagree with you that the uses of “it’s not A, it’s B” in this post is fluff and doesn’t provide value. It’s commenting on a bubble that’s making unfounded claims. It’s genuinely hard to comment on a series of false claims with corrections without using that structure. The preceding post on a different topic doesn’t use the structure
Third, the anonymity is understandable because they are commenting on coworkers.
Fourth, three essays in the space of six weeks isn’t “short succession”
None of what you cite are actual, useful, or reliable indicators of LLM-generated writing, especially since, unlike most LLM writing, these texts have a structure and cohesive argument.
If it’s from an LLM then it’s seen some editing after the fact.
Yes, fair enough.
That's why I said "assisting" - I haven't said it's completely LLM-generated (it definitely isn't).
Sorry, I didn't intend to invalidate the legitimacy of what is being said in the blog post.
I just think nowadays one needs to critically question everything that is being published to the internet.
Thank you for your reply and have a nice day. 🙂
