When I was growing up, we had operating systems that exposed a lot of the technical details about their inner workings, and websites that let us use code to customize them, like MySpace and Geocities. UX designers in tech have since optimized away most of the stuff that allowed and encouraged people to learn to use technology and now people get confused by files and browser tabs. And as the knowledge shrinks, more and more things have to be simplified away. I only ever see it as a one way road.
Replies:
18
Boosts:
10
When you come to the fork in the road, take it.
when I was growing up, you could open the hood of a car and understand what all the parts were
now it is buried beneath an enormous tangle of pipes and hoses and stuff
when my grandfather was a kid, he could fix a manual typewriter
etc etc back to the stone age guy who whined about the new fancy imported spear throwers
@Gargron Are you hinting of a geocities like interface to customize Mastodon? Now that would be awesome.
@Gargron I honestly think both paths can be walked at once.
Customizing your UI teaches you practically nothing about computers, no more than installing a different launcher on Android teaches you about what's going on inside a smartphone.
What i love about #elementaryOS for instance, is that it's very simple to use. The UI is pretty and straight forward. Customizing it is limited to wallpaper, dark/light theme and accent colors.
But when i want to do advanced stuff... 1/2
@Gargron one of the things that bother me most is that UI designers have this idea that if you have a good design any documentation becomes unnecessary. Technical documentation is becoming useless or non-existent.
@Gargron I learned to "code" using the Dbase interface. I still use the things I learned in that process.
@Gargron
Yes, and the less the user knows the easier it is to take advantage of them (not a good thing).
I guess it is part of the transition from computing as a hobby to computing as an appliance.
@Gargron in those times internet wasn't widely spread and most people who used it were either technologically proficient or didn't knew what was going on and barely understood what was happening.
Most people don't care how browsers and their computers work. They just want them to work. If your kitchen stove wasn't simple to use and you had to manually tinker with its insides to just make your food, would you actually use it? Interestingly, knowledge about how kitchen stoves work didn't shrink. People who are interested in the topic still learn it.
@tragivictoria I was a child. How was I technologically proficient? I didn't understand a thing when I first logged on. That's kind of my point.
@Gargron you were interested in it enough to learn it.
Part of the reason kitchen stoves are so easy to use is because people are not interested in how they work. If being an electrician was required just to heat up, e.g. lasagna that would be an easy way to make sure nobody would want to use them. And yet it doesn't really stop people from learning all this stuff.
In fact that was the case with linux. For the longest time it wasn't exactly the most user friendliest OS. And that's why people moved back to Windows and MacOS
Simplicity of use and limiting opportunities to learn are two different things
@tragivictoria Stoves are not a great analogy because they're relatively simple tools with a singular purpose (heating things up) and their inner workings aren't being obscured (you know if you have a gas, electric, or induction stove, and you have access to the power level settings). Now, if the power level settings on stoves were replaced with 3 settings for specific foods only, then it'd be comparable to what I'm talking about.
@Gargron When I grew up, the OS was ditched by coders, taking over the system for maximum speed and resources. 😃👍
"ChatGPT, summarize Eugen's post for me, it has too many sentences in it, way too much to read"
(/s)
@Gargron that's not fair. Back in the day people with an university degree were the ones, who would get on the internet back then.
In those days it was not at all mainstream for common people, who weren't that tech-savvy., to be online.
@Gargron I think there's a modern thirst for what used to be normal with computing and the web. Most people are sick of being boxed into a certain way of doing things - we're creative by nature and what's mainstream right now is largely restrictive in that sense.
The core problem is the commercialization of it all. Companies started wanting to sell computers and software (and show ads) to people who don't want to put in any effort to educate themselves how to use these technologies. This is how we got this relentless simplification.
Except some people just don't want tech anyway. I have an elderly relative who is essentially forced by the society to have a smartphone. It's quite predictable that she would sometimes ask me "Grisha, why is it not working well, can you take a look" and I'll see all kinds of nasty bloatware and adware she inadvertently installed. It happened on several occasions. I was able to put an end to this by setting up system-wide ad blocking via DNS like I do on my own devices.
This is what convinced me that the society needs to change to make the use of tech a choice, not a burden.
A legitimate perspective. I understand it as a technique driven perspective.
Let me add a second perspective. Reduction is an art. If ‘form follows function’ hard work is required. If done right the outcome can be pure esthetics. Thin of Braun Hi-fi equipment, Apple iPhone, Jacob Jensen, Bauhaus Designers a.o.
There are many other perspectives.
