EDIT: The person I replied to has since been moderated for 30 days.
My original message:
So if I understand correctly:
The IETF TLS-WG and Last-Call mailing lists be like:
- Concern-trolling over vague process stuff in order to drag an informational, recommended=N RFC draft into a quagmire to prevent an RFC number from being allocated? OK.
- Citing a celebrated rapist as a supporter of your objection? OK.
- Being said rapist and participating in the mailing list to the detriment to anyone that might feel unsafe by your presence? OK.
Me pointing out that Jacob Appelbaum is a rapist? Whoa now, that's a bridge too far. Gotta censor that!
Me replying to one of the moderators who objected to my initial reply with my "Hug?" sticker: "The worst in people".
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/ApZbYc1ZFRWqWQ4MFM2ATCKvOqc/
Or at least, Bron Gondwana, CEO of Fastmail, seems to think so.
(The other IETF moderators weren't jerks about it, but Bron was.)
