The 🇺🇸⚖️ US District Court for the Northern District of California had issued an “anti-steering injunction” requiring that apps be allowed to direct users to external payment methods. The district court’s ruling left some flexibility in implementation, but Apple chose “an anti-competitive option at every step”.
🧵(2/7)
Post
Justice Gonzalez Rogers found that Apple willfully chose to undermine its compliance:
🧵(3/7)
The lengths Apple went to undermine the court's ruling were to say the least extraordinary:
https://www.theverge.com/apple/659296/apple-failed-compliance-court-ruling-breakdown
🧵(4/7)
It is through this lens that we should assess whether Apple is genuinely concerned about security, or is simply using it as an excuse to block browser and browser engine competition on iOS.
🧵(5/7)
https://open-web-advocacy.org/blog/apples-browser-engine-ban-persists-even-under-the-dma/
Likewise whether security or privacy is genuinely the reason it wishes to block third-party services and devices being able to interoperate with iPhones and iPads to the same degree as Apple’s own devices and services:
🧵(6/7)
https://open-web-advocacy.org/blog/the-digital-markets-act-is-delivering-real-wins-but-not-yet-for-browser-engines/