Post

@bagder interesting to get some more details on how these things work. It does get more difficult - more marketing headlines, more "WOW" moments.

@bagder Damn! You should put some kind of notice on them for misquoting you, though!

This might escalate 🤔

@bagder

come on you said that from what you can tell it isn't that impressive that's basically a failing grade.

@bagder your article made it abundantly clear that curl has already been extensively audited for years using all of the tools and techniques available. It is nice that a tool can find a single new bug with a small number of false positives.

@bagder

How about that? You don't even need AI to hallucinate stuff!

@bagder
But do you agree that it's a marketing stunt, but it's not the greatest? 😛

@bagder "Stunt" as in "stunted"? It was so fucking obvious -.-

@bagder to be honest, this journalist's writing his quite hard for me to read

> [Stenberg] concluded the hype was mainly marketing

I am not entirely sure how to read this paragraph.

@bagder You didn’t say anything like that. You don’t talk that way. Why do they turn everything into clickbait?

@bagder aw I LOVE to see headlines like this one 🙌

especially as I’m in the middle of reading @emilymbender and @alex’s superb book “The AI Con”

@bagder Well, but besides the catchy headline they article remains close to your own blog post, wouldn't you say? To me it seems like a well written article about your findings.

@bagder I was wondering how you‘d take that headline when, as a modest Swede, you would never say it like that. 🤗

@bagder
I guess the LLM summary of your blog post did...

@bagder "you're right to push back on that. let me rephrase..." 🙂