Post
Replies:
4
Boosts:
2
@TheBreadmonkey @bytebro @TazPoltorak
i forgot about that.
LEGO's traditional "4–99" age range is primarily a marketing tool for gift-buyers, not a strict limit. The "99" ensures the box looks clean, serves as an "all-ages" indicator, and helps consumers identify the target complexity or theme, rather than posing actual safety risks for older users.
https://www.reddit.com/r/questions/comments/rtulkn/why_does_lego_have_its_age_at_499_why_isnt_it/
i remember my first lego set.
it was magical.
i honestly dont know how rich ppl end up committing crimes. if i had even $500K, i would live so peacefully, mind my own business, wear my little outfits, and just play with lego.
2 media
@amiserabilist @TheBreadmonkey @bytebro @TazPoltorak Heh .. if I were "Fuck You Money" rich, I'd rent a building, buy a few million in Legos, and post flyers all over town to just come and make things.
Note: Not being completely altruistic, I'd derive great joy and entertainment seeing what people created and I live in a very artsy community.
cc @doctorwhom
@elfin @amiserabilist @bytebro @TazPoltorak @doctorwhom
The kids on their bikes would stop outside your baroque old house with spires and an overgrown front lawn and in hushed tones would talk about how The LegoMan lives there
