Post
Even "bad for life" is questionable, because despite our best efforts we haven't figured out how to sterilize the whole planet.
Anything we're doing that harms the environment harms _the environment we (and many other species) need to survive_.
If we continue to do so, we (and many other species) will die; much faster than this would happen "naturally".
But life will adapt and go on.
We're really only doing harm to ourselves.
Even "bad for life" is questionable, because despite our best efforts we haven't figured out how to sterilize the whole planet.
Anything we're doing that harms the environment harms _the environment we (and many other species) need to survive_.
If we continue to do so, we (and many other species) will die; much faster than this would happen "naturally".
But life will adapt and go on.
We're really only doing harm to ourselves.
@thomasfuchs Bad take. Sure, some sort of life will survive even our worst mistakes, cockroaches may tank a nuke and keep on trucking, but we're wiping out a shocking amount of biodiversity every day. Regardless of humanity's fate, someday millions of years down the line there will be a similar level of biodiversity again, fine, but it will be too late for zillions of species that we've failed.
Is it ok to exterminate a people if other people will repopulate their land eventually?
Install bonfire.cafe
Get the full app experience
