Discussion
Loading...

Post

Log in
  • About
  • Code of conduct
  • Privacy
  • Users
  • Instances
  • About Bonfire
Dr. Tim Schatto-Eckrodt
Dr. Tim Schatto-Eckrodt
@Kudusch@social.tchncs.de  ·  activity timestamp yesterday

Man hört ja oft, dass LLMs man LLMs (trotz ihrer Schwächen) gut zum Zusammenfassen von Texten gebrauchen kann. In diesem Text räumt @maartenp mit diesem Fehlglauben auf und trägt relevante Studien zum Thema zusammen.

Besonders im Bezug auf das wissenschaftliche Arbeiten findet Paulusse hier klare Worte:

„Beyond hindering your own learning and research, using AI-generated summaries can also have long-term consequences for the collective scientific endeavor. Because once misinformation from AI-generated summaries remains uncorrected and seeps into published theses, research papers, and other outputs, it could contribute to a loop of misinformation.“

https://www.tue.nl/en/our-university/library/library-news/24-02-2026-are-ai-generated-summaries-suitable-for-studying-and-research

#llm #ai #summaries

Are AI-generated summaries suitable for studying and research?

Despite didactic, ethical, and environmental concerns, the use of GenAI is on the rise in academia. For most applications, the jury is still out on whether and how they will benefit education and research in the long term. But it’s already safe to conclude that one popular use case is, in fact, a bad one: AI-generated summaries.
  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block

bonfire.cafe

A space for Bonfire maintainers and contributors to communicate

bonfire.cafe: About · Code of conduct · Privacy · Users · Instances
Bonfire social · 1.0.2-alpha.34 no JS en
Automatic federation enabled
Log in
Instance logo
  • Explore
  • About
  • Members
  • Code of Conduct