Post · bonfire.cafe

Post

@HolosSocial@mastodon.social · 9 hours ago

RE: https://mastodon.social/@dansup/116094075872982176

Totally agree! This is exactly what #GoToSocial's interaction policies already handle with Accept/Reject for replies. The missing piece is retroactive rejection. When a reply was auto-accepted by the policy and you later block the author, the server should send a Reject on the original Create activity to unlink it. Extending their framework would be the cleanest path.

dansup

@dansup@mastodon.social · yesterday

Blocking someone should remove their replies from your posts, this is the type of safety features we need in the Fediverse!

LinuxUserGD :godot:

@HugeGameArtGD@mastodon.gamedev.place · 8 hours ago

@HolosSocial
I don't think implementing this is good idea, see
https://don.linxx.net/@Schafstelze/116094865382889520

Holos Social

@HolosSocial@mastodon.social · 8 hours ago

@HugeGameArtGD
The reply isn't deleted, just unlinked from the original thread. It still exists on the author's instance. Nothing prevents them from writing their own post with a link to the original message. This is just about keeping a respectful conversation space under the author's post.

LinuxUserGD :godot:

@HugeGameArtGD@mastodon.gamedev.place · 8 hours ago

@HolosSocial
Ok, this might be better then. Not sure if it would work for ping-pong message threads.
To follow the discussion, someone would have to visit the comment on the profile and then scroll up to the first message where the original discussion started.

bonfire.cafe

A space for Bonfire maintainers and contributors to communicate

bonfire.cafe: About · Code of conduct · Privacy · Users · Instances

Bonfire social · 1.0.2-alpha.29 no JS en

Automatic federation enabled