Discussion
Loading...

Post

Log in
  • About
  • Code of conduct
  • Privacy
  • Users
  • Instances
  • About Bonfire
ink
ink
@ink@merveilles.town  ·  activity timestamp 5 hours ago

I haven't used it yet, but it seems like there are many good design ideas for streams of updates in @tg's post about Current. One thing I realized after reading is how some of the ideas synthesize techniques/kludges I've been using in other tools.

For example using the "enable notifications" feature in Mastodon as a way to extend the "half life" of posts from particular accounts. I have to dip into a separate stream to see them though. Being able to let them sit in the same stream, with more control on how long they stay there seems like it would be a miracle.

In my FreshRSS feed reader I have partitioned off some blogs into a "people" category, because they are more like voices. Since RSS feeds come from such different sources, and operate on such different cadences I think it makes sense to be able to notice "voices" in the stream interface.

And Current's idea of not letting prolific accounts overwhelm the stream, reminds me of how boosted/reshared posts in @phanpy splay out horizontally to prevent them from overwhelming the vertical stream of posts that were actually composed by the sender.

https://www.terrygodier.com/current

  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
ink
ink
@ink@merveilles.town  ·  activity timestamp 4 hours ago

I know it is kind of pedantic, but I would argue that these are still algorithmic festures. It's just that design effort has made the algorithms legible and explicitly modifiable--they are not something inscrutable and Implicit happening behind the scenes. I feel like "algorithms" have been given a bad rap by social media platforms that use them as a foil. The question is, can you understand in principle what the algorithm is doing and can you control it...

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Mike Taylor 🦕
Mike Taylor 🦕
@mike@sauropods.win  ·  activity timestamp 4 hours ago

@ink You are right of course that algorithms are not *inherently* bad. It's just that 99% of the existing ones are. And that's why there's such enormous rhetorical power in being able to say of Mastodon "There is no algorithm".

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
ink
ink
@ink@merveilles.town  ·  activity timestamp 4 hours ago

@mike rhetorical power or marketing 😄 either way it operates to prevent people from understanding that there are other useful ways of ordering their online lives than by a chronological algorithm. the important question that remains is how much transparency and agency do they have...

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block

bonfire.cafe

A space for Bonfire maintainers and contributors to communicate

bonfire.cafe: About · Code of conduct · Privacy · Users · Instances
Bonfire social · 1.0.2-alpha.29 no JS en
Automatic federation enabled
Log in
  • Explore
  • About
  • Members
  • Code of Conduct