Why is it every article about LLMs includes ‘LLMs do have legitimate use cases, for example [list of use cases for which LLMs are actively dangerous]’.
Why is it every article about LLMs includes ‘LLMs do have legitimate use cases, for example [list of use cases for which LLMs are actively dangerous]’.
@david_chisnall “ChatGPT, give me a list of legitimate use cases for LLMs”
I don’t think I’m going out on a limb by saying that anyone who writes an article about LLM that isn’t a hard anti-LLM article is using an LLM to write the article
@david_chisnall Unironically, I prefer that over what I subjectively tend to see, which is (lightly paraphrased) "LLMs do have legitimate use cases, trust me bro".
@david_chisnall
Because of poor analysis. A more accurate statement would "AI has legitimate use cases"