solve over population? Educate and give reproductive autonomy to women
Discussion
Loading...
@rysiek anyone into eugenics is by definition evil
@rysiek Power corrupts. And Conservatism is the ideology that justifies corruption as natural and good.
@rysiek
Eugenics has a long history in the US, and there are always links to billionaires, but especially to movements and groups in the US that have been working for decades to select "useful" people. The tech bros are particularly keen on this. AI is also supposed to support the goal of making life comfortable for a few people on the planet, with a reduced number of people to serve as their working class.
@trending_bot
@rysiek huh
Never particularly wanted a not-Luigi to visit William until this moment.
solve over population? Educate and give reproductive autonomy to women
@libramoon "overpopulation" reeks of eugenics.
Somehow it only ever pops up in the context of the Global Majority. New York is pretty populous. So is London. But these are not the places that are attached to the "overpopulation" thing.
The problem is not population, it's resource hoarding and waste.
No doubt about education and reproductive autonomy for women, of course! But we should do that because it's the right thing to do, not because of some eugenicist ideas about who gets to procreate.
@rysiek The best probable way to exemplify eugenics is to lead the way by taking point across that silver brook. If one is unwilling - one should drop eugenics as a philosophy.
@rysiek they got the dirt on Gates and turned him
@danedeasy turned him… in what sense? to do what?
@rysiek after going to Epstein Island and these other powerful people getting the dirt on him, it’s seems Gates activities have shifted away from humanitarian pursuits.
@danedeasy you seem to be under the impression that "humanitarian pursuits" were ever something Bill Gates genuinely cared about. This is incorrect.
https://techwontsave.us/episode/197_dont_praise_bill_gates_w_tim_schwab
https://www.thenation.com/article/society/bill-gates-philanthropy-misanthropy/
https://www.currentaffairs.org/news/2022/07/how-bill-gates-makes-the-world-worse-off
@rysiek I’ll have to check this out. I thought he invested tons to wipe out malaria
RE: https://mastodon.social/@blogdiva/116076499034114875
Shout out to @blogdiva for boosting this into my timeline:
https://mstdn.social/@blogdiva@mastodon.social/116076499182804315
Receipt 1: Gates friends with Epstein
Bill Gates Met With Jeffrey Epstein Many Times, Despite His Past
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/12/business/jeffrey-epstein-bill-gates.html
> Mr. Gates started the relationship after Mr. Epstein was convicted of sex crimes.
This is from 2019, by the way.
Receipt 2: COVID vax
How Bill Gates Impeded Global Access to Covid Vaccines
https://newrepublic.com/article/162000/bill-gates-impeded-global-access-covid-vaccines
> When the director of Oxford’s Jenner Institute had funny ideas about placing the rights to its COVAX-supported vaccine candidate in the public domain, Gates intervened.
> A few weeks later, Oxford—urged on by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation—reversed course [and] signed an exclusive vaccine deal with AstraZeneca that gave the pharmaceutical giant sole rights and no guarantee of low prices.
Receipt 3: Gates and climate change
Bill Gates says climate crisis won’t cause ‘humanity’s demise’ in call to shift focus to ‘improving lives’
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/oct/28/bill-gates-climate-crisis-pivot
> Bill Gates has called for a “strategic pivot” in the effort against the climate crisis, writing that the world should shift away from trying to limit rising temperatures to instead focusing on efforts to prevent disease and poverty.
If you're wondering:
- Wait, why is this bad? He's talking about fighting hunger and poverty and such!
What gives the game away is the "improving lives" bit.
Who decides whose lives should be "improved"? Who gave Gates the right to decide which "life improvement" strategies to deploy? How is the effectiveness measured and who makes the rules about what is and what is not an "effective" way of "improving lives"?
All this has strong TESCREAL bundle eugenics vibes:
https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/13636/11599
Consider how Gates is trying to steer resources and focus away from stuff that can threaten his investments.
He is deeply invested in the AI bubble, and AI bubble means a shit-ton of additional CO₂ being pumped into the air:
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/dec/18/2025-ai-boom-huge-co2-emissions-use-water-research-finds
Fighting climate change means stronger environmental regulations, which means less money in Bill's pocket. So, we need to focus on something else! Ideally, something vague like "improving lives"! Don't look at the man behind the curtain!
3 more replies (not shown)
@rysiek careful with that axe, Eugenicist!
@rysiek I’m just going to assume all billionaires are pedophiles now. Seems like a safe bet
@Szescstopni @cinebox @rysiek I doubt a raped child would agree with your weighting.
1 more replies (not shown)
@Szescstopni @cinebox it really is not a competition and I don't think making it into one is helpful (or a good look). 