Discussion
Loading...

Post

Log in
  • About
  • Code of conduct
  • Privacy
  • Users
  • Instances
  • About Bonfire
petersuber
petersuber
@petersuber@fediscience.org  ·  activity timestamp 2 weeks ago

A review of the proceedings from four major computer-science conferences showed that none from 2021, and all from 2025, had fake citations.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.05867v1

The authors prefer the term "mysterious citations" which they define this way: "No paper [with] a similar enough title exists. The cited location either does not exist or holds an unrelated paper with different authors."

#AI #LLMs #Hallucinations #Misconduct #ScholComm

  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
Bryan S. Weber
Bryan S. Weber
@bsweber@sciences.social  ·  activity timestamp 2 weeks ago

Honestly 6% is less than I feared. More than I hoped though.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
emmatonkin
emmatonkin
@emmatonkin@mstdn.social  ·  activity timestamp 2 weeks ago

@petersuber "No author within our dataset acknowledged using AI to generate citations even though all four conference policies required it, indicating current policies are insufficient. "

A very strange mystery indeed. Perhaps we should call Poirot in so he can point out the obvious answers on page 1, knock off work early and spend the rest of the book wandering around delicatessens tasting brands of hot chocolate, or something.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block

bonfire.cafe

A space for Bonfire maintainers and contributors to communicate

bonfire.cafe: About · Code of conduct · Privacy · Users · Instances
Bonfire social · 1.0.2-alpha.34 no JS en
Automatic federation enabled
Log in
Instance logo
  • Explore
  • About
  • Members
  • Code of Conduct