@Tutanota the other method is for governments to control us

@Tutanota The question is always "Safe for who?".

@Tutanota Safe for whom? For users or for the billionaire cyberlords who want to rule and control us all?

@Tutanota So much is unregulated from a safe internet perspective - for example what gives the right for companies to fingerprint and track us, to resell our data time and time again, to be scrapped into archives and are forever doing takedown requests, for large providers having zero recourse or accountability by regular people, without hiring billion dollar lawyers. Its all f*cked up! Where are the regulators???

@Tutanota I would add parenting to the first column. Parents, it's not the governments job to police your children.

@Tutanota Odds are, eVenn this scales.

@Tutanota

Safer for whom?

@Tutanota
...fehlt aber noch....
✅Pro sicheres Internet: Dezentrale Services
❌Kontra sicheres Internet: LockIn bei (proprietären) zentralen Diensten.
🧐

@Tutanota hello

@Tutanota Besides.. Police already have the rights to go after pedos WHEN THEY HAVE WARRANT.

The essence here is that we remove probable cause, and we make everyone a suspect.

We used to be innocent until proven guilty. Now we have to prove our innocense.

@Tutanota the left column does not protect minors from AI Fake content, porn and violence. This is just the wrong sharepic for the conext

@Tutanota why age verification is not safe? Internet should be 35+ only. Because it destroys brain tissues with cat pictures.

@Tutanota

#alttext

A safer internet IS MADE BY
Encryption
Privacy
Open source

A safer internet is NOT MADE BY
Age verification
Scanning communication
Tracking & data collection

#SAFERINTERNETDAY

@Tutanota You keep using the word safer. I do not think it means what you think it means.

@Tutanota

@Tutanota Does your solution support open standards like POP/IMAP, allowing the end users to encrypt/decrypt/verify their messages EXTERNALLY? If it does not, please stop using the word "safe" and the name of your product in the same sentence.

@Tutanota
Safe internet or surveillance internet?
The choice is ours, unless governments take it away.

@Tutanota short slogans are nice for marketing.

The Internet is not safer for victims of harassment, when the attackers enjoy anonymity and no accountability because of it.

Platforms can't abide by laws, if they can't figure out if their users are legally (of age) visiting.

Brevity isn't winning any arguments.

@Tutanota and moderation for public communities, 4chan isnt exactly safe

@Tutanota The graphic is correct for email. The Internet is more than just email.

@Tutanota Without tracking and data collection recommendation algorithms would not work. And that's safer. Yes.

@Tutanota

You missed the most important one.

A safe internet require distributed and transparent ownership, not tight control by secretive for-profit companies.

Without that, none of the rest matters.

@Tutanota this way of thinking should become mainstream, but unfortunately we are far behind that in public debates.

@Tutanota true! And maybe also: Properly trained human community managers, moderation teams, dispute resolution perssonel, ... ?

@Tutanota Hear, hear!

@Tutanota how about "content moderation by humans"? Seems important to me when it comes to any platform/software, where harassment could happen.

@Tutanota Just a note. Age verification is not mutually exclusive to everything that is on the safer column. If the real world has age requirements in some operations, it's acceptable that the digital world also has the same. Making the Internet lawless is what drives attacks on other liberties.

@Tutanota It's not about a safer internet it`s about collecting more data from us.

🔗 Protecting your safety online starts here: https://tuta.com/blog/minimum-password-length

@Tutanota

That second column isn't designed to make anything safer for the end user.