Discussion
Loading...

Post

Log in
  • About
  • Code of conduct
  • Privacy
  • Users
  • Instances
  • About Bonfire
Emeritus Prof Christopher May
Emeritus Prof Christopher May
@ChrisMayLA6@zirk.us  ·  activity timestamp 15 hours ago

Here's Andy Beckett developing a theme from yesterday's time-line; how much of Labour's current polling malaise is down to Keir Starmer's preference for technocratic competence (although there are some doubts about whether he has actually demonstrated competence) over being a political communicator.

Beckett's argument about voters wanting to be engaged in a political conversation is an interesting angle... but where does this 'conversation' take place?

#politics
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/jan/30/how-we-entered-the-new-age-of-political-rhetoric-and-why-its-bad-news-for-keir-starmer

the Guardian

We have entered a new age of political rhetoric – and that’s bad news for Keir Starmer | Andy Beckett

Pre-2008, voters with prosperous and improving lives didn’t mind being excluded from the conversation. Those days are over, writes Guardian columnist Andy Beckett
  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
Jonathan Schofield
Jonathan Schofield
@urlyman@mastodon.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 12 hours ago

@ChrisMayLA6 absolutely key question. We don’t have anywhere up to the task.

Some people are trying to create such places.

Folks like https://ourhouseuk.org/

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Andy Dearden
Andy Dearden
@AndyDearden@mastodon.green replied  ·  activity timestamp 12 hours ago

@urlyman @ChrisMayLA6 would citizens assemblies be a potential simulation of Habermasian dialogues? Perhaps more impotantly, would the wider social discourse take any notice of the outputs from such assemblies? Which voices would our media overlords choose to promote?

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Jonathan Schofield
Jonathan Schofield
@urlyman@mastodon.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 12 hours ago

@ChrisMayLA6 the dilemma though is that even if we did create such forums the conversations had in them would be out of alignment with where we’re heading, by the government’s own (whispered) admission https://climatejustice.social/@GreenRupertRead/115960814841971348

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Jonathan Schofield
Jonathan Schofield
@urlyman@mastodon.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 11 hours ago

@ChrisMayLA6 @GreenRupertRead

fwiw, I’ve drawn out the salient points of the report that Rupert has written about here

https://mastodon.social/@urlyman/115983363704542599

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Emeritus Prof Christopher May
Emeritus Prof Christopher May
@ChrisMayLA6@zirk.us replied  ·  activity timestamp 12 hours ago

@urlyman

yes, if I was to come over all Habermasian, I would be distinguishing the fora & the possibility of 'ideal' political speech - that between equal interlocutors.... but thankfully I've retired so don't need to do that any more 😉

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block

bonfire.cafe

A space for Bonfire maintainers and contributors to communicate

bonfire.cafe: About · Code of conduct · Privacy · Users · Instances
Bonfire social · 1.0.2-alpha.7 no JS en
Automatic federation enabled
Log in
  • Explore
  • About
  • Members
  • Code of Conduct