Discussion
Loading...

Post

Log in
  • About
  • Code of conduct
  • Privacy
  • Users
  • Instances
  • About Bonfire
Caitlin Waddick
Caitlin Waddick
@CaitlinWaddick@social.coop  ·  activity timestamp 2 weeks ago

Event: Science for Peace presents: "Making the Abolition of War a Realistic Goal" Mar 2, 2026, 5 pm, Eastern (NYC)
45 years ago, Gene Sharp contended ... that war can realistically be abolished - if societies prepare for a credible, civilian-based nonviolent defense system capable of deterring and defeating aggression. .. Is Sharp’s notion of civilian-based defence defective? Can we modify Sharp’s approach to make this abolition a realistic goal?

https://48nig.r.ag.d.sendibm3.com/mk/cl/f/sh/6rqJfgq8dIUQXei0qTBRjewuH5O/9OLWGHxodWVE #Nonviolence

SCIENCE FOR PEACE PRESENTS: Making the Abolition of War a Realistic Goal”
Monday March 2 5 - 6:30 pm EST
Friends House, 60 Lowther Ave, Toronto & Hybrid on ZOOM
46 years ago, Gene Sharp argued, in an award-winning article, that war could
be abolished if societies built credible, civilian-based nonviolent defence
systems capable of deterring and defeating aggression. Today, we remain no
closer to abolishing war than we were in 1980. Is Sharp's idea of civilian-based
defence flawed, or can it be adapted to make abolition a realistic goal?
Read the article here: https: //www.nonviolent-conflict.org/resource/making-
the-abolition-of-war-a-realistic-goal/
 
Isaiah Ritzmann: Co-founder and Richard Sandbrook: VP of Magdalee Brunache: Blumenfeld
Co-Faciltator of the Canadian Science for Peace and Professor Junior Fellow and PhD student,
Coalition for Nonviolent Defence Emeritus, UofT UofT
SCIENCE FOR PEACE PRESENTS: Making the Abolition of War a Realistic Goal” Monday March 2 5 - 6:30 pm EST Friends House, 60 Lowther Ave, Toronto & Hybrid on ZOOM 46 years ago, Gene Sharp argued, in an award-winning article, that war could be abolished if societies built credible, civilian-based nonviolent defence systems capable of deterring and defeating aggression. Today, we remain no closer to abolishing war than we were in 1980. Is Sharp's idea of civilian-based defence flawed, or can it be adapted to make abolition a realistic goal? Read the article here: https: //www.nonviolent-conflict.org/resource/making- the-abolition-of-war-a-realistic-goal/ Isaiah Ritzmann: Co-founder and Richard Sandbrook: VP of Magdalee Brunache: Blumenfeld Co-Faciltator of the Canadian Science for Peace and Professor Junior Fellow and PhD student, Coalition for Nonviolent Defence Emeritus, UofT UofT
SCIENCE FOR PEACE PRESENTS: Making the Abolition of War a Realistic Goal” Monday March 2 5 - 6:30 pm EST Friends House, 60 Lowther Ave, Toronto & Hybrid on ZOOM 46 years ago, Gene Sharp argued, in an award-winning article, that war could be abolished if societies built credible, civilian-based nonviolent defence systems capable of deterring and defeating aggression. Today, we remain no closer to abolishing war than we were in 1980. Is Sharp's idea of civilian-based defence flawed, or can it be adapted to make abolition a realistic goal? Read the article here: https: //www.nonviolent-conflict.org/resource/making- the-abolition-of-war-a-realistic-goal/ Isaiah Ritzmann: Co-founder and Richard Sandbrook: VP of Magdalee Brunache: Blumenfeld Co-Faciltator of the Canadian Science for Peace and Professor Junior Fellow and PhD student, Coalition for Nonviolent Defence Emeritus, UofT UofT
  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
Caitlin Waddick
Caitlin Waddick
@CaitlinWaddick@social.coop replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 weeks ago

registration, online: https://us02web.zoom.us/meeting/register/f7Wem1TbTqO5IbpnkF1SiQ#/registration

Zoom

Welcome! You are invited to join a meeting: "Making the Abolition of War a Realistic Goal". After registering, you will receive a confirmation email about joining the meeting.

45 years ago, Gene Sharp contended, in this award-winning article, that war can realistically be abolished - if societies prepare for a credible, civilian-based nonviolent defense system capable of deterring and defeating aggression. Today, however, we are no closer to the abolition of war than in 1980. Is Sharp’s notion of civilian-based defence defective? Can we modify Sharp’s approach to make this abolition a realistic goal? Panelists: Isaiah Ritzmann Magdalee Brunache: Blumenfeld Junior Fellow and PhD student, U of T Richard Sandbrook: V-P, SfP and Professor Emeritus, U of T
  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block

bonfire.cafe

A space for Bonfire maintainers and contributors to communicate

bonfire.cafe: About · Code of conduct · Privacy · Users · Instances
Bonfire social · 1.0.2-alpha.7 no JS en
Automatic federation enabled
Log in
  • Explore
  • About
  • Members
  • Code of Conduct