Discussion
Loading...

Post

Log in
  • About
  • Code of conduct
  • Privacy
  • Users
  • Instances
  • About Bonfire
malte
malte
@malte@radikal.social  ·  activity timestamp 2 weeks ago

Climate conscious folks, can you help me answer this question: If we want to stay within the planetary boundary defined by 1.5°C global warming, how many emissions in CO2e can each person make per year?

I know there are several ways to make the calculation. I just want to get a ballpark number so we can get some proportions in our lifestyle choices.

#CarbonFootprint #EmissionQuota #Degrowth

  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
malte
malte
@malte@radikal.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 weeks ago

The Institute for European Environmental Policy set the qouta at 2,3 tonnes. That's roughly half of an average Danish person, but most countries in the world could actually increase their per capita emissions under that quota, esp. in Africa, but also places like Brazil, Armenia, India and Pakistan are below the quota today https://ieep.eu/publications/carbon-inequality-in-2030-per-capita-consumption-emissions-and-the-1-5c-goal/

IEEP AISBL

Carbon inequality in 2030: Per capita consumption emissions and the 1.5C goal - IEEP AISBL

The carbon footprints of the richest 1 per cent of people on Earth is set to be 30 times greater than the level compatible with the 1.5°C goal of the Paris Agreement in 2030, according to this new briefing.
  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
malte
malte
@malte@radikal.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 weeks ago

That study was made in 2021 and given that we've not seen drastic degrowth in the last four years, we've made a significant overspending of our budget, leaving less for the coming years. That means the number would likely be adjusted down. But how much - who has a more recent calculation?

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
malte
malte
@malte@radikal.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 weeks ago

That study was made in 2021 and given that we've not seen drastic degrowth in the last four years, we've made a significant overspending of our budget, leaving less for the coming years. That means the number would likely be adjusted down. But how much - who has a more recent calculation?

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Jonathan Schofield
Jonathan Schofield
@urlyman@mastodon.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 weeks ago

@malte thanks for the link. A quick look at page 3 of the source report (https://oxfamilibrary.openrepository.com/bitstream/handle/10546/621305/bn-carbon-inequality-2030-051121-en.pdf;jsessionid=A159EA1F6294BE9447493003B3F9F179?sequence=1 PDF) cites the “2.3” figure but doesn’t make clear how it’s arrived at. I presume theres’s a flawed and (as you say) out of date carbon budget being divvied up.

https://climate.mit.edu/ask-mit/how-much-carbon-dioxide-does-earth-naturally-absorb says there’s a ~100^9 tonne annual natural carbon cycle. Where to go from there I don’t know

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Jonathan Schofield
Jonathan Schofield
@urlyman@mastodon.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 weeks ago

…presumably there needs to be a decent assessment of Earth’s total biomass and what our own mass represents of that as a subset, but I understand there are many large uncertainties there – e.g. vast volumes of bacteria living deep within rock.

I’m aware of the picture below when it comes to mammals https://mastodon.social/@urlyman/113917611142953955

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block

bonfire.cafe

A space for Bonfire maintainers and contributors to communicate

bonfire.cafe: About · Code of conduct · Privacy · Users · Instances
Bonfire social · 1.0.1-beta.35 no JS en
Automatic federation enabled
Log in
  • Explore
  • About
  • Members
  • Code of Conduct