"Of the 791 participants, 504 participants completed the sample by the end, and 487 participants remained after the treatment of outliers, and only these participants were considered for the analysis."

"The Pearson correlation coefficients showed that the higher scores on Solving economic problems are associated with high levels of Cognitive reflection, Need for cognition and a higher usage of AI (Table 2)."

"Solving economic problems (SEP) measured with a tool developed by one of the authors – Prof. of Financial Management. ...students were asked to use whatever computational and informational tools they wanted, if they did not communicate with their peers. The following tools were allowed: (1) search engine (Google, Bing or similar); (2) ChatGPT or similar; (3) Excel or similar applications; (4) paper and pencil; (5) others (had to specify which). At the end of each [of the four] problem[s], students had to tick which of the tools they used to solve it."

"For calculating the “Using AI” we computed the score using summing only the “ChatGPT or similar” for the problems. The score was between 0 and 3 (mean 0.91, SD 1.15) since Problem 4 was not completely solved by anyone, and we decided not to use it in the research."