@cejjacobs @auschwitzmuseum I think 'constantly' (a less negative term would be regularly) posting victims of Nazi Germany (or the people of Nazi Germany) doesn't have to have a use. Or should be used to argue for or against something else.
@cejjacobs @auschwitzmuseum I think 'constantly' (a less negative term would be regularly) posting victims of Nazi Germany (or the people of Nazi Germany) doesn't have to have a use. Or should be used to argue for or against something else.
@cejjacobs @auschwitzmuseum I think 'constantly' (a less negative term would be regularly) posting victims of Nazi Germany (or the people of Nazi Germany) doesn't have to have a use. Or should be used to argue for or against something else.
@Schepphimself @cejjacobs @auschwitzmuseum
The user I see is to remember the horrors and atrocities and make sure #NeverAgain
In this case I agree with @cejjacobs
Never again should include every genocide
@realn2s @Schepphimself that’s the point I’m trying to make. The silence of @auschwitzmuseum on present dangers to people, first in the Palestinian areas and now more and more in the USA, if deafening. Yes, the memorial is important to remember the people killed during the Holocaust. But exactly to prevent new killings and deportations, just because who people are. Remembrance is useless if you stay silent when other people are targeted.
@cejjacobs @realn2s @auschwitzmuseum We don't agree. Places of rememberences don't have more or less political responsibility. The jumping from one topic (deportation of citizen in the US) to the alleged genocide of Palestinians was expected but I gave you the benefit of the doubt. Sadly, you disappointed and are hereby blocked.