Discussion
Loading...

Post

Log in
  • About
  • Code of conduct
  • Privacy
  • Users
  • Instances
  • About Bonfire
Prof. Sam Lawler
Prof. Sam Lawler
@sundogplanets@mastodon.social  ·  activity timestamp last month

Reposting for those not bridged to BlueSky, and to add alt-text, because this is important!

Jonathan McDowell @planet4589.bsky.social posted this morning: "The number of active satellites in orbit has now passed the 14000 mark according to my estimates"

A histogram of the number of active satellites in Earth orbit over time, colour-coded by Starlink, other maneuverable payloads, and non-maneuverable payloads.  The number steadily increases with about equal fraction maneuverable and non maneuverable, from 1960 until 2000, when there's a small jump in the number of maneuverable payloads.  And then in 2019 Starlink starts shooting up and absolutely dominates the overall number.  The total number of active satellites follows a hockey-stick shape, where the inflection point is 2019 when Starlink started launching.
A histogram of the number of active satellites in Earth orbit over time, colour-coded by Starlink, other maneuverable payloads, and non-maneuverable payloads. The number steadily increases with about equal fraction maneuverable and non maneuverable, from 1960 until 2000, when there's a small jump in the number of maneuverable payloads. And then in 2019 Starlink starts shooting up and absolutely dominates the overall number. The total number of active satellites follows a hockey-stick shape, where the inflection point is 2019 when Starlink started launching.
A histogram of the number of active satellites in Earth orbit over time, colour-coded by Starlink, other maneuverable payloads, and non-maneuverable payloads. The number steadily increases with about equal fraction maneuverable and non maneuverable, from 1960 until 2000, when there's a small jump in the number of maneuverable payloads. And then in 2019 Starlink starts shooting up and absolutely dominates the overall number. The total number of active satellites follows a hockey-stick shape, where the inflection point is 2019 when Starlink started launching.
  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
ChookMother 🇦🇺🦘
ChookMother 🇦🇺🦘
@anne_twain@theblower.au replied  ·  activity timestamp last month

@sundogplanets Hooley Dooley! And I'm thinking we didn't ever get asked whether we actually wanted this?

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Debbie Goldsmith 🏳️‍⚧️♾️🇺🇦
Debbie Goldsmith 🏳️‍⚧️♾️🇺🇦
@dgoldsmith@mastodon.social replied  ·  activity timestamp last month

@sundogplanets @planet4589.bsky.social Exponential growth? What could possibly go wrong with that?

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Oliver Schafeld
Oliver Schafeld
@oliver_schafeld@mastodon.online replied  ·  activity timestamp last month

»The CRASH Clock is ticking as satellite congestion in low Earth orbit worsens […] Professor Sam Lawler explained the origin of the acronym in a post on Mastodon: "We needed a metric. I originally wanted to do something like 'Kessler Countdown' or 'Kessler Clock' …«

https://www.theregister.com/2025/12/12/crash_clock_orbit_collision/

Earth's orbit is starting to look like an LA freeway, with more and more satellites being launched each year. If you're worried about collisions and space debris making the area unusable – and you should be – scientists have proposed a new metric to contribute to your anxiety: the CRASH Clock.

The CRASH (Collision Realization And Significant Harm) Clock is a proposed Key Environmental Indicator (KEI) to give an estimate of how long it would take before a catastrophic collision occurs if collision avoidance maneuvers cease or there is a loss of situation awareness.

The clock is currently 2.8 days, which doesn't sound too bad until you consider that in 2018, before the mega-constellation launches got underway (yes, Starlink, we're looking at you), the CRASH Clock was 121 days.

Professor Sam Lawler explained the origin of the acronym in a post on Mastodon: "We needed a metric. I originally wanted to do something like 'Kessler Countdown' or 'Kessler Clock' but this isn't a countdown to Kessler Syndrome, it's just showing how bad things are in orbit, and how quickly they could get worse. So, our name for this metric is... Collision Realization And Significant Harm: the CRASH Clock!" — The Register
Earth's orbit is starting to look like an LA freeway, with more and more satellites being launched each year. If you're worried about collisions and space debris making the area unusable – and you should be – scientists have proposed a new metric to contribute to your anxiety: the CRASH Clock. The CRASH (Collision Realization And Significant Harm) Clock is a proposed Key Environmental Indicator (KEI) to give an estimate of how long it would take before a catastrophic collision occurs if collision avoidance maneuvers cease or there is a loss of situation awareness. The clock is currently 2.8 days, which doesn't sound too bad until you consider that in 2018, before the mega-constellation launches got underway (yes, Starlink, we're looking at you), the CRASH Clock was 121 days. Professor Sam Lawler explained the origin of the acronym in a post on Mastodon: "We needed a metric. I originally wanted to do something like 'Kessler Countdown' or 'Kessler Clock' but this isn't a countdown to Kessler Syndrome, it's just showing how bad things are in orbit, and how quickly they could get worse. So, our name for this metric is... Collision Realization And Significant Harm: the CRASH Clock!" — The Register
Earth's orbit is starting to look like an LA freeway, with more and more satellites being launched each year. If you're worried about collisions and space debris making the area unusable – and you should be – scientists have proposed a new metric to contribute to your anxiety: the CRASH Clock. The CRASH (Collision Realization And Significant Harm) Clock is a proposed Key Environmental Indicator (KEI) to give an estimate of how long it would take before a catastrophic collision occurs if collision avoidance maneuvers cease or there is a loss of situation awareness. The clock is currently 2.8 days, which doesn't sound too bad until you consider that in 2018, before the mega-constellation launches got underway (yes, Starlink, we're looking at you), the CRASH Clock was 121 days. Professor Sam Lawler explained the origin of the acronym in a post on Mastodon: "We needed a metric. I originally wanted to do something like 'Kessler Countdown' or 'Kessler Clock' but this isn't a countdown to Kessler Syndrome, it's just showing how bad things are in orbit, and how quickly they could get worse. So, our name for this metric is... Collision Realization And Significant Harm: the CRASH Clock!" — The Register

Paper proposes a CRASH Clock for satellite collision risk

: It's getting crowded up there
  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Ray McCarthy
Ray McCarthy
@raymaccarthy@mastodon.ie replied  ·  activity timestamp last month

@sundogplanets @planet4589.bsky.social
All because Mobile vs Fibre and poor regulation.

Almost no-one should need Internet by satellite.

It's an example of how unbridled capitalism & letting individual countries authorise global space use has gone wrong.

Fibre is cheap, lower environmental install and running cost & doesn't wear out.
Can go up gas pipes, water or sewerage, on poles or in a ditch via a fast trenching machine.

Starlink solar vulnerable & not long term economic.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Duncan Blues
Duncan Blues
@duncan_blues@norden.social replied  ·  activity timestamp last month

@sundogplanets @planet4589.bsky.social
The movie "Wall-E" was much too prophetic. 😒

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
catsaretheworst
catsaretheworst
@catscatscats@mastodon.social replied  ·  activity timestamp last month

@sundogplanets @planet4589.bsky.social What if we just stop global warming by sending up so many satellites that we can't see the sun anymore

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Ms. Que Banh
Ms. Que Banh
@PhoenixSerenity@beige.party replied  ·  activity timestamp last month

@sundogplanets @planet4589.bsky.social That's far too much space junk pollution.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Mark Burton
Mark Burton
@markhburton@mstdn.social replied  ·  activity timestamp last month

@sundogplanets @planet4589.bsky.social
Alternative alt text:
"Graph showing what happens when an obscenely rich man's company is left free to wreak irresponsibly dangerous damage.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Lazarou Monkey Terror 🚀💙🌈
Lazarou Monkey Terror 🚀💙🌈
@Lazarou@mastodon.social replied  ·  activity timestamp last month

@sundogplanets @planet4589.bsky.social
With all this debris soon to come down it's like there has been a war in LEO....

#Space #Starlink #LEO #KesslerSyndrome

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Erika
Erika
@Erika@ruhr.social replied  ·  activity timestamp last month

@sundogplanets I thought of you this morning when I opened my window to have a look at the stars. And there was a "moving star"... and another one... and another one. I'd never seen them like pearls in a necklace, but there they were. 2 hours before sunrise, all going eastwards. Terrible.

@planet4589.bsky.social

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Inc Hulk 🧪
Inc Hulk 🧪
@IncHulk@mastodon.green replied  ·  activity timestamp last month

@sundogplanets @planet4589.bsky.social Do you know if the betting industry is accepting bets on the date of Kessler syndrome happening?
If they have an option of “before end of the decade”, what odds should you think are a bargain offer?

I never bet, but the concept feels interesting !

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Anton
Anton
@syvash@mastodon.social replied  ·  activity timestamp last month

@sundogplanets @planet4589.bsky.social waiting for my account to get old enough so
brid.gly lets me do it :D

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Tom Hayward
Tom Hayward
@hattom@mastodon.social replied  ·  activity timestamp last month

@sundogplanets @planet4589.bsky.social

Thanks for posting.
🥲

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block

bonfire.cafe

A space for Bonfire maintainers and contributors to communicate

bonfire.cafe: About · Code of conduct · Privacy · Users · Instances
Bonfire social · 1.0.1-beta.35 no JS en
Automatic federation enabled
Log in
  • Explore
  • About
  • Members
  • Code of Conduct