@david@arjen Very nice! I whish I'd seen this during my PhD time, because such AND-default, conjunctive normal form query language is what I needed at the time(!)
@djoerd@david this reminded me of a different screenshot or maybe even a drawing, to explain why interactive relevance feedback was a more powerful technique in the past:
Because you enter a query and then get the documents presented through the same interface, the user could not do otherwise than give their feedback, before they could continue to the next document.
With Web search engines essentially only providing a meta page, this feature has been lost. (With advantages too of course.)
@djoerd@david yes... of course, the user should have autonomy, so the situation where you'd always _force_ them to provide feedback is also suboptimal, but there is a middle ground to explore!
@djoerd @david this reminded me of a different screenshot or maybe even a drawing, to explain why interactive relevance feedback was a more powerful technique in the past:
Because you enter a query and then get the documents presented through the same interface, the user could not do otherwise than give their feedback, before they could continue to the next document.
With Web search engines essentially only providing a meta page, this feature has been lost. (With advantages too of course.)