@danielatafani@poliversity.it
A quite reasonable policy that concretely means "don't use #LLM".
My only objection is to this sentence:
BUT it's totally reasonable to held accountable for its output those who run it and sell its output as a service.
Whatever #OpenAI's websites display to users, it is Open AI's choice to display it, so it's their own responsibility, be it output of a LLM or #SamAltman own writing.
We can and should held these companies legally accountable. Talking of #AI (obviouslack of) responsibility is misleading and only serves the interests of these companies.
So a better wording would heve been
A quite reasonable policy that concretely means "don't use #LLM".
My only objection is to this sentence:
Since AI tools cannot take responsibilitySure, it would be dumb to attribute responsibility to a software.
BUT it's totally reasonable to held accountable for its output those who run it and sell its output as a service.
Whatever #OpenAI's websites display to users, it is Open AI's choice to display it, so it's their own responsibility, be it output of a LLM or #SamAltman own writing.
We can and should held these companies legally accountable. Talking of #AI (obviouslack of) responsibility is misleading and only serves the interests of these companies.
So a better wording would heve been
Since AI companies pretend to be above the Law and don't want to be held accountable for anything...@pluralistic@mamot.fr @mcp@poliversity.it @Iris@scholar.social @olivia@scholar.social