Discussion
Loading...

Post

  • About
  • Code of conduct
  • Privacy
  • Users
  • Instances
  • About Bonfire
Pete Bachant
@petebachant@fediscience.org  ·  activity timestamp last week

Jupyter notebooks are fine to use in production as long as their outputs aren't considered "official" unless they are run in batch mode, e.g., with nbconvert or papermill. That is, you should never deliver any result from a notebook you ran interactively.

#reproducibility #openscience

  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
Sharlatan
@sharlatan@mastodon.social replied  ·  activity timestamp last week

@petebachant Guix backed Jupyter kernel for reproducible "production ready" research https://codeberg.org/guix-science/guix-jupyter

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Pete Bachant
@petebachant@fediscience.org replied  ·  activity timestamp last week

@sharlatan nice! Any luck getting "non-hacker" scientists to use it?

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Christian Meesters
@rupdecat@fediscience.org replied  ·  activity timestamp last week

@petebachant I share your view. Even blogged about it (once upon a time ...). Seen groups literally produce hundreds, sometimes thousands of notebook files. Very much akin to the infamous piled higher and deeper comic: https://phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=1531

And still: These people insist it is the holy reproducibility grail. The "gold standard" ⬅️ this is a quote! 🤦‍♂️

I recommend getting a PubPeer account ... 😉

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Log in

bonfire.cafe

A space for Bonfire maintainers and contributors to communicate

bonfire.cafe: About · Code of conduct · Privacy · Users · Instances
Bonfire social · 1.0.1-alpha.8 no JS en
Automatic federation enabled
  • Explore
  • About
  • Members
  • Code of Conduct
Home
Login