Discussion
Loading...

Post

  • About
  • Code of conduct
  • Privacy
  • Users
  • Instances
  • About Bonfire
Dan Goodman
@neuralreckoning@neuromatch.social  ·  activity timestamp 2 weeks ago

@elduvelle follow this thread because the commentary is almost as interesting as the paper (which also looks very cool btw):

https://bsky.app/profile/behrenstimb.bsky.social/post/3m6i6v3ydf22n

https://bsky.app
View
  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
James Mitchell-White
@kuraisle@mastodon.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 weeks ago

@neuralreckoning I'm just glad to know all I need to publish my next paper is to look for missing values and runctitional features in my data

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Lucas C. Wheeler
@lcwheeler@ecoevo.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 weeks ago

@neuralreckoning "Historical medical frymblal" is a very important point. 😂

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
El Duvelle
@elduvelle@neuromatch.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 weeks ago

@neuralreckoning oooh what's the 2nd article? 👀
(I know, that's not the point of your post but I'm already convinced that Nature Publishing Group sucks and that #eLife is better 😊 )

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Dan Goodman
@neuralreckoning@neuromatch.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 weeks ago

@elduvelle follow this thread because the commentary is almost as interesting as the paper (which also looks very cool btw):

https://bsky.app/profile/behrenstimb.bsky.social/post/3m6i6v3ydf22n

https://bsky.app
View
  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Albert Cardona
@albertcardona@mathstodon.xyz replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 weeks ago

@neuralreckoning @elduvelle

The paper:

"The inevitability and superfluousness of cell types in spatial cognition", Luo et al. 2025
https://elifesciences.org/reviewed-preprints/99047v2

Quite the poster child for why at @eLife we support publishing papers that we consider important and yet nonetheless label as incomplete: the questions are worth asking, the discussion has to happen, the suggested experiments need to be voiced out and aired, to prompt someone to take them on to the lab.

#ScientificPublishing

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Dan Goodman
@neuralreckoning@neuromatch.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 weeks ago

@albertcardona @elduvelle @eLife yes I'm so glad to see it! So far most eLife papers just looked like normal journal papers, but this shows what the new model can do. Brilliant stuff.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Albert Cardona
@albertcardona@mathstodon.xyz replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 weeks ago

@neuralreckoning @elduvelle @eLife

Can't agree more. Scientific publications are the means for scientists to talk to each other in a formalised way, and not at all as a way to accrue points towards career advancement or funding. Let's retake that original purpose from the choking grasp of the bean counters.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
El Duvelle
@elduvelle@neuromatch.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 weeks ago

@neuralreckoning ooh.. Just seeing the title I remember having a look at the preprint some time ago and thinking that it made quite bold claims without properly understanding the biology of the "spatial cells". I'll have a look at the thread & eLife reviews when I get a chance!

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Log in

bonfire.cafe

A space for Bonfire maintainers and contributors to communicate

bonfire.cafe: About · Code of conduct · Privacy · Users · Instances
Bonfire social · 1.0.1-alpha.8 no JS en
Automatic federation enabled
  • Explore
  • About
  • Members
  • Code of Conduct
Home
Login