Discussion
Loading...

Post

Log in
  • About
  • Code of conduct
  • Privacy
  • Users
  • Instances
  • About Bonfire
Tinker ☀️
Tinker ☀️
@tinker@infosec.exchange  ·  activity timestamp 2 months ago

Mua-hahahaha!!!

Yes. Yes that's right.

Down with the consumer economy of built-in obsolescence, disposable tech, and subscriptions.

Up with Right to Repair, Permacomputing, Library and Share Economies!

(Also trollololol on "device hoarding" and "costing economy {sic})

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/11/23/how-device-hoarding-by-americans-is-costing-economy.html

#solarPunk #rightToRepair #permacomputing #libraryEconomy

  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
Darren
Darren
@DJDarren@mendeddrum.org replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 months ago

LB: "Not being able to afford new shit is killing the economy!"

Lol, eat my balls.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
[nate@social0 ~]$ :idle:
[nate@social0 ~]$ :idle:
@gangrif@social.undrground.org replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 months ago

@tinker And while we're at it, how about repairable devices? Eh?

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Dr. Dek 👨‍🚀🐧🚀 )
Dr. Dek 👨‍🚀🐧🚀 )
@portaloffreedom@social.linux.pizza replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 months ago

@tinker this whole article it full of absolute tecno-finance babble non-sense. I don't read to the end to understand that it's completely full of unsupported claims that disappear into thin air with just the smallest research.

> "Small businesses, in particular, lose valuable hours each year due to lagging systems, creating what economists call a 'productivity drag,'
you loose a lot of productivity if you need to change your processes to adapt to new hardware every wimp of marketing from the big companies

> Operating at higher GB speeds requires different electronic hardware, and a lot of the older technology can't handle it.
First: no, internet can handle multiple devices at different speeds, so it's not a low layer problem. It is not a home problem because most common hardware can handle 1Gb, it's the providers that have some hard time deploying it. On the mobile space it's not a technology issue: phones can go so fast but the data per month is extremely limited. Even with a 10 year old phone I could burn common data caps in the EU in a day.

so much bullshit.... what are they trying to sell?

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Tinker ☀️
Tinker ☀️
@tinker@infosec.exchange replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 months ago

@portaloffreedom - I love how every quote from people that being frugal, sustainable, and maintaining their equipment is just so reasonable and down to earth.

Its like they're trying to make it seem bad but the people they interviewed just make their title claim seem to stupid.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
primalmotion
primalmotion
@primalmotion@antisocial.ly replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 months ago

@tinker I have a 7y old Linux Phone, and an 8y old laptop with a 12y old processor. I'm more productive than any ibro and their constant distraction inducing tracking, change-me-every-year, bs devices.

Not sorry if that makes Tim fucking Cook sad.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Chuckles
Chuckles
@celeduc@mastodon.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 months ago

@tinker I can't wait to find out how much I'm costing the economy by not using generative AI

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Steve Leach
Steve Leach
@stevenaleach@sigmoid.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 months ago

@tinker I *hope* that was mostly written by an LLM. Otherwise all the weird stuff about lost productivity and networks having to lower their speeds (what?) were hallucinations produced by a *human* writer, which is just scary.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Zimmie
Zimmie
@bob_zim@infosec.exchange replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 months ago

@tinker “Both the cellular and internet infrastructure has to operate to be backwards compatible in order to support the older, slower devices. Networks often have to throttle back their speeds in order to accommodate the slowest device”

Okay? Sounds like the cell carriers shouldn’t have spent all that money deploying stuff people don’t want.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Megawatt
Megawatt
@Megawatt@infosec.exchange replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 months ago

@tinker yeah, and the "lost productivity" bit is crap.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Alex
Alex
@alex02@ieji.de replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 months ago

@tinker I want to buy more devices...

but stuff i actually like.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Alex
Alex
@alex02@ieji.de replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 months ago

@tinker I want to buy more devices...

but stuff i actually like.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
benji_w
benji_w
@benji_w@aus.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 months ago

@tinker The headline sucks, but most of the article seems to be focused on making things repairable or upgradeable (instead of outright replacement),
and that when people work on slower devices that can suck for productivity,
rather than mostly "Tech Companies Need Your Money To Survive."

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Tinker ☀️
Tinker ☀️
@tinker@infosec.exchange replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 months ago

@benji_w - They end with blaming individuals on not buying the latest. Its a weird thing where they are claiming an individual keeping their phone affects businesses with loss of productivity for using "slow" devices.

I think all the folks espousing what we would consider positives is lost on the author as they try to use it as evidence that these people are hurting the economy.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
John Timaeus
John Timaeus
@johntimaeus@infosec.exchange replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 months ago

@tinker @benji_w

I don't think it's too much to ask that electronic devices I buy have a life span similar to other appliances.

We've reached a pretty mature ecosystem, refresh cycles should be in the decade-plus range.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Corey Snipes 🍂
Corey Snipes 🍂
@coreysnipes@hachyderm.io replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 months ago

@johntimaeus @tinker which, I should say, is quite a bit shorter than it used to be. We still use the clothes dryer my mother gave me, which was made in 1969 (!). It has like five major components, all repairable or replaceable, and YOU CAN STILL GET THOSE PARTS. By contrast, we recently replaced the dryer in our rental house which was ~10 years old because the stupid non-repairable plastic control button assembly failed and had to be replaced every 2 years.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Rachel Rawlings
Rachel Rawlings
@LinuxAndYarn@mastodon.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 months ago

@tinker @benji_w If work wants me to have a faster phone, work can fucking buy it for me. I've also used this argument to insist I'm not putting Microsoft Authenticator on anything I own.

(And when I clock out it will be turned off or going airport mode. Sleep well, helpdesk.)

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
benji_w
benji_w
@benji_w@aus.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 months ago

@tinker That's a fair and valid reading of the article.

My preferred solution would be to focus on making software bloat Not make devices behave slower, in addition to repair/reuse...

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
v
v
@valkyrie@wandering.shop replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 months ago

@tinker damn didn't realize i was responsible for propping up bad economic models my bad gonna keep hoarding anyway

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Tinker ☀️
Tinker ☀️
@tinker@infosec.exchange replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 months ago

@valkyrie - Hoarding is such charged language, too. Like. How much are they paying the writer for such blatant corporate bootlicking.

To take frugal, sustainable, an responsible actions and call it hoarding. As if not throwing things away and throwing money away and buying the latest all the time is responsible.

Just obtuse and stupid.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
fraggLe!
fraggLe!
@fwaggle@moodoo.org replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 months ago

@tinker @valkyrie Keeping one device past two or more upgrade cycles while it's still functioning isn't hoarding, it's completely reasonable frugal behavior.

The pile of vintage computers in my office that I'll totes play with one day but they make me happy just sitting there inanimate otherwise, that's fucken hoarding.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
fraggLe!
fraggLe!
@fwaggle@moodoo.org replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 months ago

@tinker @valkyrie Also Henry Ford figured out ages ago that you sell more shit if your workers are paid enough to buy more shit so maybe the fuckers could do something with that tidbit

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
🦠Toxic Flange (Gurjeet)🔬⚱️🌚
🦠Toxic Flange (Gurjeet)🔬⚱️🌚
@Toxic_Flange@infosec.exchange replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 months ago

@tinker This is such an incredibly biased and stupid article based on questionable statement of facts.

"Oh we process things at 1Gb/s instead of 100Mb/s..".. no dumbass, ideal human readable speed is still at 1200bps! ... BAUD!

just.. so much anger at this article:D

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Tinker ☀️
Tinker ☀️
@tinker@infosec.exchange replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 months ago

@Toxic_Flange - I *love* it! 😂

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
🦠Toxic Flange (Gurjeet)🔬⚱️🌚
🦠Toxic Flange (Gurjeet)🔬⚱️🌚
@Toxic_Flange@infosec.exchange replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 months ago

@tinker Old man yells at News.. right here, thats me right now:)

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Aaron Sawdey, Ph.D.
Aaron Sawdey, Ph.D.
@acsawdey@fosstodon.org replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 months ago

@tinker what if it ISN’T OUR JOB to prop up the economy by constantly buying stuff that is going to be (by intent!) ewaste in 5 years? 🤬

Everybody I know in tech is mad because it doesn’t have to be like this. Oh and also software doesn’t need to suck. We want bug fixes and we get “liquid glass” nonsense.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Tinker ☀️
Tinker ☀️
@tinker@infosec.exchange replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 months ago

@acsawdey - Agreed. Its not our job to give the rich more money. Especially for disposable expensive crap.

Sooooo.... we're not.

We can just ignore them and do our own thing.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Aaron Sawdey, Ph.D.
Aaron Sawdey, Ph.D.
@acsawdey@fosstodon.org replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 months ago

@tinker Yeah. Explaining to everyone I can how cloud IoT stuff just means they’ll shut it off and force you to buy something new as soon as they feel they can get away with it.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Tinker ☀️
Tinker ☀️
@tinker@infosec.exchange replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 months ago

@acsawdey - Truth

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block

bonfire.cafe

A space for Bonfire maintainers and contributors to communicate

bonfire.cafe: About · Code of conduct · Privacy · Users · Instances
Bonfire social · 1.0.1-beta.35 no JS en
Automatic federation enabled
Log in
  • Explore
  • About
  • Members
  • Code of Conduct