@TallSimon @bmaxv a replication should be a particularly prominent type of review comment, in this view.
Discussion
Loading...
@neuralreckoning @bmaxv @dvdgc13
Perhaps replication, and reporting replication, is something we can also encourage in the nascent #OpenScienceNetwork (based on @bonfire) as well.
Edit: IIRC Royal Society papers print a lot of review responses. Theirs might be a pattern to replicate.
@TallSimon @neuralreckoning
I've seen several links to Bonfire, but I still don't understand what is it trying to do and what makes it stand out (and promising)? I would appreciate any explanations or pointers