Discussion
Loading...

Post

  • About
  • Code of conduct
  • Privacy
  • Users
  • Instances
  • About Bonfire
tante
@tante@tldr.nettime.org  ·  activity timestamp 6 hours ago

So, @anildash wrote an interesting reflection on "AI" and Firefox a few days ago: https://www.anildash.com/2025/11/14/wanting-not-to-want-ai/

He argues that the number of people who want Mozilla to just stop with the AI development and focus on a more traditional browser is small (probably true) and that people are so used to using AI in their everyday lives that it's Firefox's/Mozilla's job to make that as secure and "less big tech dependy" as possible.

I think that's not an unreasonable argument. I do think that the actual question is more about _what Mozilla is for_ and not "AI" (or other tech hypes).

From my reading the people who don't want AI in Firefox are often AI critical, sure. But it's also about resources and narrative. The idea of Mozilla was to have something that would work for the good of the open web, that would fight for users through participating in standards development but that would also argue based on what is right. Mozilla's sales pitch was a moral one - at least that is how many in the community on Mastodon for example interpreted it.

So when Mozilla cuts down on policy work, cuts work on technologies like Servo or Rust that were supposed to materially improve the security of browsers and people online while setting a lot of developer hours on fire in order to integrate fundamentally insecure (and some would say fundamentally anti-"open web") systems "just because people use them", it feels like an organization having lost their mission or the drive to push their values.

I think "AI" is just the latest (and probably biggest) event that illustrates a sentiment that has been brewing for a while: That Mozilla's mission or goals have shifted in a way that their original supporters no longer feel aligned with.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
haaflife
@haaflife@ohai.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 hours ago

@tante @anildash "the idea of Mozilla.. " nah, Firefox was supposed to be a better browser than IE and chrome. Faster and less resource hungry. When it stopped working well and everything was dependent on chrome, people stopped using ff. Adding a philosophical layer to it, why we need Mozilla etc. doesn't help or change that. 99% of people don't care what Mozilla does or does not stand for. They want a working browser.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
crazyeddie
@crazyeddie@mastodon.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 hours ago

@tante @anildash I don't know that anyone's done any favors by being encouraged to use AI to do shit like track their hours because their boss is ripping them off.

Because that's the kind of shit people do with it. That's the GOOD kind of shit anyway. The other is getting talked into suicide.

And why it need to be integrated? Huh? What's that providing? I really need an AI to help me navigate the fucking browser interface? Really?

**sniff** -- smells like the countryside.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
ploum
@ploum@mamot.fr replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 hours ago

@tante @anildash : " people are so used to using AI in their everyday lives"

I seriously consider that those are the niche people.

Lot of everyday-people use AI only because it pops up everywhere and only to discuss their love affairs with ChatGPT.

People tells me that they don’t use AI personally but "it will be big". Then ask me how to disable then annoying AI in Whatsapp.

Studies demonstrated that "contains AI" is actually a turn-off for a majority of consumers.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Thomas 🔭🕹️
@thomasfuchs@hachyderm.io replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 hours ago

@tante @anildash “AI” is the antithesis of the open web.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
StarkRG@myside-yourside.net
@StarkRG@myside-yourside.net replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 hours ago

@tante @anildash Why should it be *anyone's* job to make it easier to access morally irresponsible tech, let alone a company that's supposed to be making the world better?

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Al & Val's Modern Homesteading
@alandvalonline@mastodon.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 hours ago

@tante @anildash At one time, we at least had some CHOICE in most things. But the melding of everything web into a homoganeous goop because "everyone wants/uses it" has doomed choice for most of us. Follow the leader is a kids game, not a way of life.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
VampirePenguin
@VampirePenguin@mastodon.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 hours ago

@tante @anildash It's sad, because I've been a Firefox user and advocate for decades- even at times when there were usability problems with the software or the foundation was making dubious decisions- but coddling this AI nonsense is just a step too far. It's clear at this point that the MBA brainrot has fully taken root in Mozilla. I'll be jumping ship.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
contrasocial
@contrasocial@mastodon.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 hours ago

@tante @anildash

Nah, people hate AI generally. The push to infect every app with AI is due to pressure from those who've over-invested in the bubble and are desperate to find some kind of use case for their ocean drinking wrong-answer machine.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Ray McCarthy
@raymaccarthy@mastodon.ie replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 hours ago

@tante @anildash
"Mozilla to just stop with the AI development and focus on a more traditional browser is small"

IRRELEVANT.
LLMs are a lie, and Mozilla isn't even doing a good core Firefox and Thunderbird. Wrecking it for years.
Do a good browser that follows OS theme / GUI and does nothing else. Print doesn't work properly.
Too much is on by default and hidden in about:config,

If people want the planet destroying, content stealing, misleading AI there are no shortage of con artists.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Hana Aianhanma
@aianhanma@toot.community replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 hours ago

@tante @anildash To be blunt: the main reason the number of people who have any opinion on the matter is small would be because the firefox user base is tiny to begin with.

Anyone who cared is likely to have left the ship, especially with the captain shoving them to the lifeboats.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
UpLateGeek
@UpLateGeek@bitbang.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 hours ago

@tante @anildash it’s like a car maker deciding to make “the electric truck of the future” when most people just want a normal-looking truck. Or making a bipedal humanoid robot because they think everyone wants one. Chasing these trends might get them a few new customers, but they’ve got a lot more existing customers who bought cars years ago and might look at buying a new one if they just made new models of their existing lines (or just a normal-looking truck).

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Cybarbie
@nf3xn@mastodon.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 4 hours ago

@tante @anildash Ah the silent majority. I must have missed this survey of what #firefox users actually want? AFAICT they seem dead set against it, can't remember a single 'I am a firefox user and love the new AI stuff' toot. The number of firefox users has dwindled massively over the past few years, almost negligible now. I used to use firefox because they were very user focused, that and the alternative was IE lol. 🦊

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
MarjorieR
@marjolica@social.linux.pizza replied  ·  activity timestamp 4 hours ago

@tante @anildash "He argues that the number of people who want Mozilla to just stop with the AI development and focus on a more traditional browser is small (probably true)"

So are the number of people who currently choose Firefox as their browser. I suspect that the overlap is quite large.

Given the insidious spread of LLMs into just about everything else, making available a browser that guarantees to offer a LLM free experience - something that doesn't then hog their development resources when there are more important things to do and
remembering that having an embedded cloud LLM is a privacy nightmare - seems like a better project for Mozilla to pursue.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
AJ Sadauskas
@aj@gts.sadauskas.id.au replied  ·  activity timestamp 4 hours ago

@tante @anildash
Here's another project to add to the list for anyone who cares about the Fediverse.

Almost a year ago, Mozilla shut down its Mastodon instance: https://techcrunch.com/2024/09/17/mozilla-exits-the-fediverse-and-will-shutter-its-mastodon-server-in-december/

Mozilla /could/ have chosen to redirect its AI resources towards Fediverse projects.

That could have come in the form of development support for Fedi projects.

Just imagine what a project like Friendica or GtS or Lemmy could accomplish with even one or two full-time paid staff funded by Mozilla.

Mozilla /could/ have built user friendly client apps for Fediverse platforms.

Mozilla /could/ have built Fediverse-integrated features (bookmark sharing?) or plugins for Firefox.

Mozilla /could/ have offered managed Fediverse server hosting.

It chose not to.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
endolexi
@endolexi@social.vivaldi.net replied  ·  activity timestamp 4 hours ago

@tante Yes, I share that impression. Originally Mozilla was "let's work against the Torment Nexus", now it's more like "the Torment Nexus is being built with or without us, let's contribute to make it as humane as possible". Or something. I don't know. All I know is I've turned my back on them as soon as they turned their back on what makes sense and what is right, and I can't be bothered to hope they'll somehow regain integrity. Usually it's a one-way street.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
diabhoil
@diabhoil@social.tchncs.de replied  ·  activity timestamp 5 hours ago

@tante

One problem is that if everyone is continuing like this with AI everywhere, in the future we do not need (or have) browsers at all.

Then a "website" is just a service providing structured data for AI crawlers. Users are chatting with AI Apps to shop, get news or do stuff (many already replaced google and not visiting websites with the results anymore). In the background Agents are doing everything.

I visited an MS event early this year and this was the vision of the MS guy talking. I do not like it.

@anildash

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
rhold
@rhold@norden.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 5 hours ago

@tante @anildash

on the product level there is an easy fix: make it possible to opt-out from #AI to give people a choice. This is rather trivial.

The remaining question is how should Mozilla utilize its resources. I see no meaningful compromise or option here.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
tante
@tante@tldr.nettime.org replied  ·  activity timestamp 5 hours ago

@rhold @anildash Anil argues for exactly that: Give people who don't want that a big "disable AI" button

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Fabiano Celentano
@fabio@zirk.us replied  ·  activity timestamp 5 hours ago

@tante @rhold @anildash No, he really doesn't. He writes that everyone who doesn't share his AI love is stupid and to shut us up, Mozilla should provide that option. That's not an honest argument for anything, that's just a thinly veiled insult.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
tante
@tante@tldr.nettime.org replied  ·  activity timestamp 4 hours ago

@fabio @rhold @anildash I mean yeah his phrasing is ... a bit condescending ... bit I wouldn't go as far as you did.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
tante
@tante@tldr.nettime.org replied  ·  activity timestamp 6 hours ago

Basically: Sure people do a thing and like it but maybe it's not Mozilla's job to make that kind of thing even easier.

(Like with Facebook etc they built containers to isolate those browsing experiences: This was a move of "we have to protect users but we also show them that what they are doing is not without significant dangers and harms". The move when it comes to "AI" looks structurally massively different.)

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
(((2024 YR4)))
@klefstadmyr@social.vivaldi.net replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 hours ago

@tante I use a computer and I like sliced bread, but that doesn't mean that I like my computer to make sliced bread.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
tante
@tante@tldr.nettime.org replied  ·  activity timestamp 6 hours ago

(Of course I am writing from my interpretation of what Mozilla is and my hopes for what it could be. So there's of course some projection in there.)

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Log in

bonfire.cafe

A space for Bonfire maintainers and contributors to communicate

bonfire.cafe: About · Code of conduct · Privacy · Users · Instances
Bonfire social · 1.0.0 no JS en
Automatic federation enabled
  • Explore
  • About
  • Members
  • Code of Conduct
Home
Login