Discussion
Loading...

Post

  • About
  • Code of conduct
  • Privacy
  • Users
  • Instances
  • About Bonfire
Patrick Breyer
@echo_pbreyer@digitalcourage.social  ·  activity timestamp 2 days ago

🇪🇺✅ SUCCESS: We've prevented mandatory #ChatControl through the back door!🎉 A big win & THANKS to everyone! 🙏

But ⚠️: Anonymity-breaking age checks & "voluntary" mass scanning are still planned. The fight continues next year!

https://chatcontrol.eu

The image shows a short excerpt of text from the latest Council draft regulation on "Chat Control". The text reads: "(17a) Nothing in this Regulation should be understood as imposing any detection obligations on providers."
The image shows a short excerpt of text from the latest Council draft regulation on "Chat Control". The text reads: "(17a) Nothing in this Regulation should be understood as imposing any detection obligations on providers."
The image shows a short excerpt of text from the latest Council draft regulation on "Chat Control". The text reads: "(17a) Nothing in this Regulation should be understood as imposing any detection obligations on providers."
  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
Samuel
@samuel@social.spejset.org replied  ·  activity timestamp yesterday

@echo_pbreyer also another positive thing today:

The Christian Democrats in Sweden voted today on their national congress to oppose Chat Control.

They are one of the parties in goverment.

https://omni.se/partistyrelsen-forlorade-i-chat-control-debatten/a/wgyq7L

The next party we should direct our attention to in Sweden will be "Liberalerna" (the Liberals).

Things are looking hopeful today!

Omni

Partistyrelsen förlorade i ”chat control”-debatten

Kristdemokraternas riksting har röstat nej till EU-kommissionens ”chat control” – det omdebatterade lagförslaget som syftar till att bekämpa barnövergrepp på internet. Det rapporterar TT.
  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Patrick Breyer
@echo_pbreyer@digitalcourage.social replied  ·  activity timestamp yesterday

@samuel Well done, congrats!

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
numanumayey
@breathOfLife@infosec.exchange replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 days ago

@echo_pbreyer

when next year?

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Patrick Breyer
@echo_pbreyer@digitalcourage.social replied  ·  activity timestamp yesterday

@breathOfLife I expect the trilogue to start in January.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Synnef
@synnef@mastodon.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 days ago

@echo_pbreyer one down, several more to go 👀

can we get a source to this new modification of the proposal? I can't seem to find it anywhere. Thanks!

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Patrick Breyer
@echo_pbreyer@digitalcourage.social replied  ·  activity timestamp yesterday

@synnef It's not published yet.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
iguana09863
@iguana09863@mastodon.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 days ago

@echo_pbreyer Really? They already said that?

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Dimas
@Dimas@social.edu.nl replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 days ago

@echo_pbreyer Excellent. Any news on the current timeline?

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Patrick Breyer
@echo_pbreyer@digitalcourage.social replied  ·  activity timestamp yesterday

@Dimas Yes, it's maintained here: https://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/posts/chat-control/#timeline

Patrick Breyer

Chat Control: The EU’s CSAM scanner proposal

🇫🇷 French: Traduction du dossier Chat Control 2.0, stopchatcontrol.fr🇸🇪 Swedish: Chat Control 2.0🇩🇰 Danish: chatcontrol.dk🇳🇱 Dutch: Chatcontrole The End of the Privacy of Digital Correspondence Take action to stop Chat Control now! The Chat Control 2.0 proposal in detail Cha
  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Dimas
@Dimas@social.edu.nl replied  ·  activity timestamp yesterday

@echo_pbreyer thanks!

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Gerrit Venema 🇪🇺🌍🍉
@gvenema@fairmove.net replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 days ago

@echo_pbreyer

The age checks seem to be the newest gateway drug into authoritarianism. Politicians on the mainland have seen the British doing it, and they are green with envy. Because of course the next thing is banning all vpns and anonymizers and go to an Applefied walled garden internet like China that is controllable by bureaucrats and their political bosses.

All the while leaving Nazi bars like X completely open to business.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Tinkerer
@tinkerer@ieji.de replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 days ago

@echo_pbreyer They will try in every occasion to pass it. I hope they never succeed. This age verification and “voluntary scanning”!!! will be forced upon citizens with some blackmail tactics and social engineering. We must be alerted and watching out for any strange tactics coming their way.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Patrick Breyer
@echo_pbreyer@digitalcourage.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 days ago

🇫🇷✅ RÉUSSI : Le #ChatControl obligatoire par la petite porte a été évité !🎉 MERCI à tous ! 🙏

Mais ⚠️ : Des contrôles d'âge destructeurs d'anonymat & des scans de masse "volontaires" sont toujours prévus. Le combat continue l'année prochaine !

https://chatcontrol.eu

L'image montre un court extrait de texte du dernier projet de règlement sur le "Chat Control". Le texte est le suivant : « (17a) Nothing in this Regulation should be understood as imposing any detection obligations on providers. »

Traduction en français : « (17a) Aucune disposition du présent règlement ne doit être interprétée comme imposant des obligations de détection aux fournisseurs. »
L'image montre un court extrait de texte du dernier projet de règlement sur le "Chat Control". Le texte est le suivant : « (17a) Nothing in this Regulation should be understood as imposing any detection obligations on providers. » Traduction en français : « (17a) Aucune disposition du présent règlement ne doit être interprétée comme imposant des obligations de détection aux fournisseurs. »
L'image montre un court extrait de texte du dernier projet de règlement sur le "Chat Control". Le texte est le suivant : « (17a) Nothing in this Regulation should be understood as imposing any detection obligations on providers. » Traduction en français : « (17a) Aucune disposition du présent règlement ne doit être interprétée comme imposant des obligations de détection aux fournisseurs. »
  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Wietze Brandsma 🏴‍☠️
@wabrandsma@mastodon.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 days ago

@echo_pbreyer 🇳🇱✅ SUCCES: Verplichte #ChatControl via de achterdeur is voorkomen!🎉 Een grote overwinning & BEDANKT allemaal! 🙏

Maar ⚠️: Leeftijdscontroles die de anonimiteit tenietdoen & “vrijwillige” massale scans nog steeds op de planning. De strijd gaat volgend jaar verder!

chatcontrol.eu

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Log in

bonfire.cafe

A space for Bonfire maintainers and contributors to communicate

bonfire.cafe: About · Code of conduct · Privacy · Users · Instances
Bonfire social · 1.0.0 no JS en
Automatic federation enabled
  • Explore
  • About
  • Members
  • Code of Conduct
Home
Login