One of the top stories on Hacker News today was a post arguing that Mozilla shouldn't accommodate any usage of AI in Firefox because (understandably) people were mad at Big AI companies for all the horrible things they've done to users and the internet and society. But I think people are ignoring the reality that *hundreds of millions of users* are using LLMs today, and they need to have tools from platforms that will look out for their interests. https://www.anildash.com/2025/11/14/wanting-not-to-want-ai/
54
Replies
·
0
Boosts
@anildash I'm flattered to get a reply from you to my post, Anil! I wrote a new post answering some of your thoughts: https://manualdousuario.net/en/reply-anil-dash-firefox-mozilla-ai/
@anildash
Adding automatic misinformation to Firefox is in no way is looking out for user interests.
@anildash Your argument appears to be, "Well, everyone *else* is jumping off the Empire State Building, so..."
You basically lost me in paragraph four, with, "Hundreds of millions of users are choosing to go to these websites, of their own volition, and engage with these tools."
"Choosing?" Really? The same way people "choose" to use Edge, or "choose" to use Bing, or "choose" to use the Mob's protection services?
What role do you see any browser having in protecting users against LLMs?
@ewhac are you unaware that ChatGPT is in the top 10 websites in the United States, from *direct input* — meaning people typing in the website address themselves so that they can use it? That Sora has been at the top of the App Store chart for _weeks_? How did I lose you by talking about a factual thing? Is everyone on Mastodon in a complete bubble where they don't have access to reality, isolated from the actual internet?
@anildash I'm not disputing your figures; merely what appears to be your stance of inevitability. In the 1960's over 40% of US adults had taken up smoking, which was also very dumb.
My question still stands: What role do you see Web browsers having in mitigating/preventing users being harmed/exploited by abusive LLMs?
@anildash - As one of the many people who posted in the Mozilla thread, I agree that the "nobody wants AI in Firefox" sentiment expressed by the majority is incorrect. Clearly *someone* wants it. *I* don't want it, and made an account just to say so, along with urging that any AI features be *fully opt-outable*.
@NIGHTEN It's a complex topic fraught, rightly, with fear and emotion. There are some professional LLM tools I have used that are ethical and game changers but when those outside intended audience see them, there is only rage and a lack of stepping back and viewing them as tools and nothing else. We have a long way to go in this discussion....
I think within the next 5 years or so corporations will escalate the internet so much that society will just stop using the internet in complete, and it'll just end up into one of those phases we don't like to talk about while being in public spaces communicating with real people again.
@anildash I mean yeah, that's the same solution people have been asking for since all this started. It's been in Mozilla's mentions here, it's in the comments of news articles, it's on the Mozilla forums, there's been posts about it on their feature request site...people have been telling Mozilla to add that "disable AI" button since they started adding AI. They don't care.
Consider how they handled this in the past. There was a similar level of anger when they were adding playback of DRM content. And that's why if you open your Firefox settings, you'll see a checkbox to disable DRM playback. Been there for years. Doesn't change every time they push a new release, doesn't silently renable itself, you turn it off and it's off. They know how to do this, they just aren't a company that gives a shit about the freedom of their users anymore.
And it's obvious why all the big AI companies are trying to shove this shit down our throats -- following the model of companies like Amazen and Uber, they want to become "too big to fail" before they go bankrupt, and they're burning money FAST. But what the hell is the justification for Mozilla giving us all the middle finger here? That's the question that needs an answer...
> But I think people are ignoring the reality that *hundreds of millions of users* are using LLMs today, and they need to have tools from platforms that will look out for their interests.
Where are you getting those numbers from? Is it from the marketing departments of the AI companies pushing AI into everything? You know, those with a vested interested in juicing their numbers to, for example, secure further investments for services that don't seem to actually make money?
@anildash Then why not just make this a purely optional extension? Ask users whether they want to have this during installation. If they don't, just do not install the extension – problem solved for every user!
@anildash Why should it be a "shut _off_ all AI features" button? Why not have it off by default and put in a "turn _on_ AI" button? I suppose that won't boost some executive's metrics, though.
@anildash On Earth 2, hundreds of millions of people are injecting bleach to ward off infection , just like Earth 2 Trump told them to, so Earth 2 CVS and Earth 2 Walgreens need to accommodate them.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cly17834524o
https://www.sanders.senate.gov/op-eds/ai-must-benefit-everyone-not-just-a-handful-of-billionaires/
Lots of people advocated for slavery, disenfranchised women, fossil fuel use, and DDT for the "benefits" too.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/nov/03/wealth-billionaires-increase-trump
https://www.cnbc.com/2025/08/10/ai-artificial-intelligence-billionaires-wealth.html
@anildash Thank you for this. I use iOS Firefox’s one-click on-device AI summary feature almost every single day.
In situations when I’d normally hit the back button, it actually gets me to engage with content for longer than I would have otherwise.
It’s possible to both use these tools, and still be skeptical of big AI.
@anildash I do appreciate your article and your point of view.
Hello from France :)
@anildash Browsers already allow you to do anything including using LLMs by opening the respective website and there also is a way of extending the browser's features with extensions. Why do LLMs need to be part of the core browser features?
No matter how often I use a hammer I still don' want a hammer attached to every other tool I use.
