Discovering and then relying on magit was a both a curse and a blessing.
I really like jj. But losing magit is just unacceptable.
Post
Discovering and then relying on magit was a both a curse and a blessing.
I really like jj. But losing magit is just unacceptable.
@picnoir Indeed, that is why I mostly still use git. jj also had some features missing but they've mostly closed the gap (jj annotate, jj fix). I have some code to at least run jj describe from emacs and show a crude dashboard https://git.sr.ht/~puercopop/jujutsushi but the hardest thing for me, is thinking of a good UI that remains flexible to the many ways one can use jj
@picnoir From what I see jj is a Jabber client? How does it relate to Magit? :-)
@civodul @picnoir https://jj-vcs.github.io/jj/latest/ It is version control system with a git-compatible backend. It has a simpler conceptual model than git (ej. no staging area) while also being more powerful (ej. an operation to split a commit, a revset query language, etc). It also has some ux improvements like 'first-class conflicts' and jj fix to run linters against the file stored in the index and update the revision
A space for Bonfire maintainers and contributors to communicate