@Em0nM4stodon @_elena about the discussion where they try to compare humans to other animals, it's like saying: "it's a problem. [random microwave product] cannot be used by a blind as it doesn't talk"; and someone replies: "tell me, does the sink talk?", to indicate "it's a self-made problem", just because the sink is an equipment found in a house as well as the microwave. It's so-called polluting the debate, IMHO.
And very irritating.
But to reply in tone, I have no problem to propose: try approaching mama wolf with her little wolves to cuddle them like a plush, and have a selfie with them. Let's share the experience with unnecessary privacy if you ever come back!
Going serious: we're experiencing the debate on erotic websites and age verification systems. I'm perfectly aligned to Electronic Frontier Foundation's privacy battles because being daily surveilled, without consent, is not an excuse. And with which reason? Protect kids.
Kids aren't protected this way, because sex predators, being spied by age verification stuff, will go to hunt in apparently free territories: hobby related networks, gaming chats, etc. The risk is already there, and now it's just amplified.
Here we have another weird philosophy: "if I've nothing to hide, I have not to worry about my privacy".
That was a strong discussion cause with my ex, he publicly talks about his health conditions and would like people to do it as well.He goes to toilet with open door, etc.
But, if you don't want or feel not to need it, doesn't mean privacy is useless.
And it's especially a huge problem for people with disability, as I am. I use AI and electronic glasses daily, why should I let them control my life without transparency? I should be aware of where that material goes, every time I talk to my glasses to have them translate or read something. My data are mine.
