Discussion
Loading...

Post

  • About
  • Code of conduct
  • Privacy
  • Users
  • Instances
  • About Bonfire
Charlie Stross
@cstross@wandering.shop  ·  activity timestamp 3 weeks ago

A thought that occurred to me early in reading this take-down of NASA's Orion capsule is that NASA is now 67 years old, and we shaved apes are *terrible* at building institutions that function for more than an average human life expectancy, on the order of 70-80 years.

Even before Trump, NASA was probably likely to wither and die before 2050. Now I think it'll be lucky it make it to 2030.
https://spacey.space/@nyrath/115485574021179202

  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
Elena ``of Valhalla''
@valhalla@social.gl-como.it replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 weeks ago

@cstross for sure, the probability at founding that any institution will survive for 80 years are pretty slim

but I wonder if the probability of a 67 years old institution to survive 80 more years aren't significantly higher: they should have already gone through at least a couple of generational changes and other events that cause the early failure of most institutions.

We do have a big handful of examples of institutions that lasted for centuries, or even millennia (not unchanged, and in many cases their current state wouldn't be recognized by the people from the time of their founding, but they are still there)

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Jocelynephiliac :reclaimer:
@twipped@twipped.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 weeks ago

@cstross @vmstan @nyrath at this point I'll be surprised if the united states make it to 2030

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Rob Landley
@landley@mstdn.jp replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 weeks ago

@cstross After Challenger exploded they put Dan Quayle in charge, but the real issue was Boomers took over. Neil Armstrong was 38 when he landed on the moon: in 1969 the oldest Boomer was 23.

FDR's New Deal and the WWII veterans did amazing things, which the Boomers inherited and took credit for. The WHO repurposed WWII supply chains in 1948 and declared war on smallpox 1958. Since Boomers took that over they have eliminated zero diseases.

The Baby Boom has collected value, not created it.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
A man is retired.
@Photo55@mastodon.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 weeks ago

@landley @cstross
Got close to Polio.
Who eliminated Rinderpest? (Not my area either way).

We are close to eliminating cervical cancer of the sorts caused by human papilloma viruses and genital warts as a side effect.

Each reversal in those is caused by religious nuts. (And Americans) We are still making progress on the long job of eliminating that.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Timo
@timo21@mastodon.sdf.org replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 weeks ago

@landley @cstross I'm assuming by boomers you mean the first wave of baby boomers, the ones born before 1954, the ones that could get drafted. The ones that did all the cultural revolutions, the ones that marched for peace, the ones that all voted for Reagan once they couldn't get drafted, the ones getting fewer and fewer every day. There's a lot of later boomers who had nothing to do with what you say they did. The first wave clogged the jobs ahead of us for 40 years.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
IanMoore3000
@IanMoore3000@mastodon.ie replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 weeks ago

@landley @cstross not sure I'd blame the boomers for WHO's failure to eliminate more diseases. I suspect it's more that all the easily eliminated ones are gone. Also the concept of boomers is a bit Euro-American and not everyone in senior positions in the WHO is from that part of the world.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Eleanor Saitta
@dymaxion@infosec.exchange replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 weeks ago

@cstross
If it does, of will be entirely and only because of a) systematic underfunding vs. the benefit it delivered to society, industry, and the country since at least the early 90s, and b) repeated ridiculous presidential priority switches that have nothing to do with what would be useful. Neither of those is a NASA issue as such.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Charlie Stross
@cstross@wandering.shop replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 weeks ago

@dymaxion I think you discount (c) a regime motivated by actual malicious intent towards the United States of America, with a side-order of graft and corruption (I'm thinking of Project 2025 and Donald Trump here).

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Eleanor Saitta
@dymaxion@infosec.exchange replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 weeks ago

@cstross
Oh sure. But that, like my a and b above, has nothing to do with NASA as such.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Charlie Stross
@cstross@wandering.shop replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 weeks ago

@dymaxion So all three options can be condensed to "enemy action"!

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Eleanor Saitta
@dymaxion@infosec.exchange replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 weeks ago

@cstross There was a certain amount of plausible deniability until recently, even if the Mars stuff did stretch the boundaries of the probable.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Electropict
@electropict@mastodon.scot replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 weeks ago

@cstross

Well, I used to think that, rather cheerfully and absent-mindedly, about things like the Monarchy and the Church of Rome and others. Then one day while I was getting on a bit, there was a new Pope suddenly, and it sort of reframes your perspective.

There's 'function for n period' and then there's 'exist for n period' and the latter seems to be a superclass with other members.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Dr. Eric J. Fielding, PhD
@EricFielding@mastodon.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 weeks ago

@cstross I hope that NASA can survive as a government agency longer than 2030. I think that NASA is the most popular agency of the U.S. government with the public. The Orion spacecraft and Space Launch System rocket may not have a long future but NASA does many other things, including Earth Observation and planetary science.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Charlie Stross
@cstross@wandering.shop replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 weeks ago

@EricFielding Your baseline assumption is that the US government itself survives longer than 2030. Until November 2024 that was a very solid bet: now it's much less certain. (Whether you'll still have a democracy after November 2026 is now in question.)

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Brian Gordon
@elasticsoul@mastodon.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 weeks ago

@cstross

I predicted (guessed!) in 2005 that civilization-as-we-know-it would collapse by 2030, and unfortunately I may be right. I was thinking that #ClimateChange, peak oil, and democratic decay would do us in. We found more oil, but that turned out to be a bad thing.

"NASA is now 67 years old, and we shaved apes are *terrible* at building institutions that function for more than an average human life expectancy, on the order of 70-80 years."

#Collapse #NASA

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Log in

bonfire.cafe

A space for Bonfire maintainers and contributors to communicate

bonfire.cafe: About · Code of conduct · Privacy · Users · Instances
Bonfire social · 1.0.0 no JS en
Automatic federation enabled
  • Explore
  • About
  • Members
  • Code of Conduct
Home
Login