I tried #Grokipedia. Just once. I looked up #Scarfolk. Grok took a kernel of truth - a real news report about Scarfolk - but completely invented all the details including a poster, graphic, and title/slogan that don't exist. Grok then repeats the story further down but with contradictory details.
Discussion
Loading...
Post
There are many other repetitions, some of which contradict each other, plus numerous false details: Publishers, dates, etc. It's actually *much* quicker to read a genuine, human-penned Wikipedia entry than it is to sift through this verbose gibberish and then have to fact check every detail.
bonfire.cafe
A space for Bonfire maintainers and contributors to communicate
Automatic federation enabled